Explain why health information technologies are critical to quality improvement in healthcare

1. Batalden PB, Davidoff F. What is “quality improvement” and how can it transform healthcare? Qual Saf Heal Care. 2007;16(1):2–3.

   Article  Google Scholar 

2. Berwick DM, James B, Coye MJ. Connections between quality measurement and improvement measures. Med Care. 2003;41(1):30–8.

   Google Scholar 

3. Donabedian A. The quality of care : how can it be assessed ? JAMA. 1988;260(12):1145–50.

   Article  Google Scholar 

4. Taylor MJ, McNicholas C, Nicolay C, Darzi A, Bell D, Reed JE. Systematic review of the application of the plan-do-study-act method to improve quality in healthcare. BMJ Qual Saf. 2014;23(4):290–8.

   PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

5. Strome TL. Healthcare analytics for quality and performance improvement. Hoboken: Wiley; 2013. p. 265.

   Book  Google Scholar 

6. Ivers N, Jamtvedt G, Flottorp S, Young JM, OdgaardJensen J, French SD, et al. Audit and feedback: effects on professional practice and healthcare outcomes. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 (6). https://www.cochrane.org/CD000259/EPOC_audit-and-feedback-effects-on-professional-practice-andpatient-outcomes.

7. van der Veer SN, de Keizer NF, Ravelli ACJ, Tenkink S, Jager KJ. Improving quality of care. A systematic review on how medical registries provide information feedback to health care providers. Int J Med Inform. 2010;79(5):305–23.

   PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

8. Bradley EH, Holmboe ES, Mattera JA, Roumanis SA, Radford MJ, Krumholz HM. Data feedback efforts in quality improvement: lessons learned from US hospitals. Qual Saf Heal Care. 2004;13(1):26–31.

   CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

9. Simms RA, Yelland A, Ping H, Beringer AJ, Draycott TJ, Fox R. Using data and quality monitoring to enhance maternity outcomes: a qualitative study of risk managers’ perspectives. BMJ Qual Saf. 2014;23(6):457–64.

   PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

10. Walshe K, Smith J. Healthcare management. 2nd ed. London: Open University Press; 2011.

    Google Scholar 

11. Van Limburg M, van Gemert-Pijnen JE, Nijland N, Ossebaard HC, Hendrix RM, Seydel ER. Why business modeling is crucial in the development of eHealth technologies. J Med Internet Res. 2011;13(4):1–11.

    Google Scholar 

12. van Gemert-Pijnen JEWC, Nijland N, van Limburg M, Ossebaard HC, Kelders SM, Eysenbach G, et al. A holistic framework to improve the uptake and impact of eHealth technologies. J Med Internet Res. 2011;13(4):1–18.

13. Greenhalgh T, Wherton J, Papoutsi C, Lynch J, Hughes G, A’Court CA, et al. Beyond adoption: A new framework for theorizing and evaluating nonadoption, abandonment, and challenges to the scale-up, spread, and sustainability of health and care technologies. J Med Internet Res. 2017;19(11):1–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

14. Greenhalgh T, Robert G, Magfarlane F, Bate P. Diffusion of innovation in service Organisations. Milbank Q. 2004;82(4):581–629.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

15. Cresswell K, Sheikh A. Organizational issues in the implementation and adoption of health information technology innovations: an interpretative review. Int J Med Inform. 2013;82(5):e73–86.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

16. Ingebrigtsen T, Georgiou A, Clay-Williams R, Magrabi F, Hordern A, Prgomet M, et al. The impact of clinical leadership on health information technology adoption: systematic review. Int J Med Inform. 2014;83(6):393–405.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

17. Greenhalgh T. How to improve success of technology projects in health and social care. Public Heal Res Pract. 2018;28(September):1–4.

    Google Scholar 

18. Plsek EP, Greenhalgh T. The challenge of complexity in health care. BMJ. 2001;323:625–8.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

19. Greenhalgh T, Wherton J, Papoutsi C, Lynch J, Hughes G, Court CA, et al. Analysing the role of complexity in explaining the fortunes of technology programmes : empirical application of the NASSS framework. BMC Med. 2018;16(66):1–15.

    Google Scholar 

20. Glouberman S, Zimmerman B. Complicated and Complex Systems: What Would Successful Reform of Medicare Look Like? Commission on the Future of Health Care in Canada, Discussion Paper 8. 2002.

21. Cohn S, Clinch M, Bunn C, Stronge P. Entangled complexity: why complex interventions are just not complicated enough. J Heal Serv Res Policy. 2013;18(1):40–3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

22. Mesterton J, Ladfors L, Ekenberg Abreu A, Lindgren P, Saltvedt S, Weichselbraun M, et al. Case mix adjusted variation in cesarean section rate in Sweden. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2017;96(5):597–606.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

23. Mesterton J, Brommels M, Ladfors L, Lindgren P, Amer-Wåhlin I. Inter-hospital variations in health outcomes in childbirth care in Sweden : a register-based study. Int J Qual Heal Care. 2018:1–7.

24. Mesterton J, Lindgren P, Abreu AE, Ladfors L, Lilja M, Saltvedt S, et al. Case mix adjustment of health outcomes, resource use and process indicators in childbirth care: a register-based study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2016;16(125):1–9.

    Google Scholar 

25. Regeringskansliet. Insatser för kvinnors hälsa. Regeringskansliet. 2019. Available from: https://www.regeringen.se/artiklar/2016/11/insatser-for-kvinnors-halsa/. [cited 2019 Feb 12].

26. Kitzinger J. Qualitative research: introducing focus groups. Br Med J. 1995;311:299–302.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

27. Tong A, Sainsbury P, Craig J. Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research ( COREQ ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups. Int J Qual Heal Care. 2007;19(6):349–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

28. Bernard HR. Research methods in anthropology - qualitative and quantiative approaches. 3rd ed. Oxford: AltaMira Press; 2002.

    Google Scholar 

29. Nyumba TO, Wilson K, Derrick CJ, Mukherjee N. The use of focus group discussion methodology: insights from two decades of application in conservation. Methods Ecol Evol. 2018;9(1):20–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

30. Hsieh H-F, Shannon SE. Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qual Health Res. 2005;15(9):1277–88.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

31. Assarroudi A, Heshmati Nabavi F, Armat MR, Ebadi A, Vaismoradi M. Directed qualitative content analysis: the description and elaboration of its underpinning methods and data analysis process. J Res Nurs. 2018;23(1):42–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

32. Bradley EH, Curry LA, Devers KJ. Qualitative data analysis for health services research: developing taxonomy, themes, and theory. Health Serv Res. 2007 Aug;42(4):1758–72.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

33. Damschroder LJ, Robinson CH, Francis J, Bentley DR, Krein SL, Rosland AM, et al. Effects of performance measure implementation on clinical manager and provider motivation. J Gen Intern Med. 2014;29(4):877–84.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

34. Hayes C, Yousefi V, Wallington T, Ginzburg A. Case study of physician leaders in quality and patient safety, and the development of a physician leadership network. Healthc Q. 2010;13(September):68–73.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

35. Clarke ALL, Shearer W, Mcmillan AJ, Ireland PD. Investigating apparent variation in quality of care: the critical role of clinician engagement. Med J Aust. 2010;193(8):111–3.

    Google Scholar 

36. Canaway R, Bismark M, Dunt D, Kelaher M. Medical directors’ perspectives on strengthening hospital quality and safety. J Health Organ Manag. 2017;31(7–8):696–712.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

37. Sorensen R, Iedema R. Redefining accountability in health care: managing the plurality of medical interests. Health. 2008;12(1):87–106.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

38. Storkholm MH, Mazzocato P, Savage M, Savage C. Money’s (not) on my mind: a qualitative study of how staff and managers understand health care’s triple aim. BMC Health Serv Res. 2017;17(1):1–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

39. Epstein A. Performance measurement and professional improvement. In: Smith PC, Mossialos E, Papanicolas I, Leatherman S, editors. Performance measurement for health system improvement: experiences, challenges and prospects. Cambridge: University Press; 2010. p. 613–40.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

40. Mannion R, Davies HTO. Reporting health care performance: learning from the past, prospects for the future. J Eval Clin Pract. 2002;8(2):215–28.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

41. Kansagara D, Tuepker A, Joos S, Nicolaidis C, Skaperdas E, Hickam D. Getting performance metrics right: a qualitative study of staff experiences implementing and measuring practice transformation. J Gen Intern Med. 2014;29(SUPPL. 2):607–13.

    PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

42. Post AR, Kurc T, Cholleti S, Gao J, Lin X, Bornstein W, et al. The analytic information warehouse (AIW): a platform for analytics using electronic health record data. J Biomed Inform. 2013;46:410–24.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

43. Saunders B, Sim J, Kingstone T, Baker S, Waterfield J, Bartlam B, et al. Saturation in qualitative research: exploring its conceptualization and operationalization. Qual Quant. 2018;52(4):1893–907.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

Page 2

Skip to main content

From: How can technology support quality improvement? Lessons learned from the adoption of an analytics tool for advanced performance measurement in a hospital unit