STANDARDS ON AUDITINGSA 200 - 299 General Principles andResponsibilitiesContents SA 200 Overall Objectives of the Independent Auditor and the Conduct of an Audit in Accordance with Standards on Auditing SA 210 - Agreeing the Terms of Audit Engagements SA 220 - Quality Control for an Audit of Financial Statements SA 230 – Audit Documentation SA 240 - The Auditor’s Responsibilities Relating to Fraud in an Audit of Financial Statements SA 250 - Consideration of Laws and Regulations in an Audit of Financial Statements SA 260 - Communication with Those Charged with Governance SA 265 - Communicating Deficiencies in Internal Control to Those Charged with Governance and Management SA 299 – Joint Audit of Financial Statements Show
SA 200 - Overall Objectives of the Independent Auditor and theconduct of an Audit in accordance with Standards on Auditing1. 1 IntroductionStandards on auditing are written in context of an audit of financial statements by an auditor. Independent auditor is obliged to comply with all the SAs relevant for the audit of financial statements. They are to be adapted if the circumstances addressed in the SAs exists in the audit. The auditor is required to have an understanding of the complete SA, with respect to its objectives and application. 1. 2 Scope of SA 200.
SAs do not impose responsibilities on management or those charged with governance and do not override laws and regulations that govern their responsibilities. Contents Scope of SA Overall objectives of Independent Auditor & Scope of Audit Audit of Financial Statements Requirements of Auditor Compliance with SAs Audit Risk Inherent Limitations of Audit
These support auditor in obtaining reasonable assurance.
SAs include Objectives Requirements Application Other explanatory material Reasonable assurance is a high level of assurance but is not an absolute level of assurance, because there are inherent limitations of an audit. Auditor expressesopinion regardingfinancial health of theorganisationWhen reasonable assurance cannot be obtained and a qualified opinion in the auditor’s report is insufficient, auditor can disclaim an opinion or withdraw from the engagement, where withdrawal is legally permitted
Management’s Responsibility The audit of the financial statements does not relieve management or those charged with governance of their responsibilities. Their main responsibilities are: Maintain adequate accounting records Select and apply appropriate accounting policies Design internal controls in line with size and nature of the entity Prevent and early detection of fraud and error Follow fundamental accounting assumptions Preparation of financial statements in accordance with applicable framework Safeguard assets Performed by Auditor for the benefit of members/ intended users Objective Enhance degree of confidence of intended users in financial statements Outcome Opinion expressed whether or not financial statements prepared as per financial reporting framework give true and fair view Requirements Auditor to ensure audit is conducted as per SAs & other ethical requirements Audit is an independent examination of financial information of an entity with a view to expressing an opinion there on.
Identify and assess risks of material misstatement, whether dueto fraud or error, based on an understanding of o the entity o entity’s environment, o entity’s internal control. Obtain sufficient appropriate audit evidence about whether material misstatements exist, through designing and implementing appropriate responses to the assessed risks. Form an opinion on the financial statements based on conclusions drawn from the audit evidence obtained and will depend upon the applicable financial reporting framework and any applicable laws or regulations.
Identify Risk Obtain evidence Form Opinion
Statute governing the enterprise Pronouncements of ICAI like AS and SAs Terms of engagement. However, terms of engagement can’t override the other two
SA 200 covers the following major aspects with respect to the requirements an auditor has to fulfil: Ethical requirements in relation to financial statements. Carry out audit with professional skepticism Exercise professional judgement wherever required. Obtain sufficient and appropriate audit evidence. Comply with Standards on Auditing.
Professional skepticism doesn’t mean that auditor doubts every bit of information given by the client. Auditor may accept records provided to him as genuine unless he has a reason to believe the contrary. However, he should bear in mind that there is a possibility of its misstatement and follow a cautious approach.
Professional Judgment is necessary for audit procedures in aspects like Materiality and audit risk. The nature, timing, and extent of audit procedures used to meet the requirements of the SAs and gather audit evidence. Evaluating whether sufficient appropriate audit evidence has been obtained, and whether more needs to be done to achieve the objectives of the SAs and thereby, the overall objectives of the auditor. The evaluation of management’s judgments in applying the entity’s Auditor’s professionaljudgement should berational, reasonable andappropriate to thecircumstances.Benefits of following professional skepticism – Minimize the risk of overlooking - Unusual circumstances - Using inappropriate assumptions Auditor should not doubteverything but always bealert that there is apossibility ofmisstatement.Professional judgement is judgement taken by auditor out of his professional experience in an audit situation applicable financial reporting framework. The drawing of conclusions based on the audit evidence obtained, for example, assessing the reasonableness of the estimates made by management in preparing the financial statements.
Audit evidence is cumulative in nature and is primarily obtained from audit procedures performed during the course of the audit. In Audit both quality and quantity are equally important. This concept is elaborated in SA 500.
The auditor shall comply with all SAs relevant to the audit. SA is relevant to the audit when the SA is in effect and the circumstances addressed by Professional Skepticism vs Professional Judgement Professional skepticism is necessary for high-quality professional judgment, but it is only one component of what is necessary for the auditor to exercise sound professional judgment. For example, skepticism without requisite accounting and auditing industry expertise is not sufficient to obtain high-quality judgment. Sufficient Audit Evidence = Quantity of evidence. (Eg. Testing the 70% of the transactions.) Appropriate Audit Evidence = Quality of evidence. (relevance & reliability in supporting auditor’s conclusion) (Eg. Obtaining 3rd Party confirmations.) The risk that the procedures performed by the auditor to reduce audit risk to an acceptably low level will not detect a misstatement that exists and that could be material, either individually or when aggregated with other misstatements. Auditor has to plan his procedures to minimize the audit risk after taking into consideration the three risks.
Risk of material misstatement exists at two levels. Overall financial statement level The overall financial statement level (risks of material misstatement that relate pervasively to the financial statements as a whole and potentially affect many assertions) and Assertion level Control Risk is inversely related to Detection Risk. If the internal controls of an organization are effective it means the control risk is low and auditor will perform lesser audit procedures which results in higher detection risk and vice versa. Misstatement – A difference between the amount, classification, presentation, or disclosure of a reported financial statement item and the amount, classification, presentation, or disclosure that is required for the item to be in accordance with the applicable financial reporting framework The assertion level for classes of transactions, account balances, and disclosures. SA 315 establishes requirements and provides guidance on identifying and assessing the risks of material misstatement at the financial statement and assertion levels.
Example: The inherent risk is that it's raining, which is controlled by the nature and has no bearing of the audit. This is compared to the risk that misstatements are likely to occur in Financial Statements. Like how an umbrella can help us from not getting wet, controls of company are designed to avoid misstatements. The risk that we might get wet even after using an umbrella is control risk. Next is the detection risk, where we did not anticipate the rainfall or the size of the umbrella is smaller than required is compared to audit procedures to apply during the audit. All the three risks together make Audit risk. 1. 6 Objective Stated in Individual SAsTo achieve the overall objectives of the auditor, the auditor shall use the objectives stated in relevant SAs in planning and performing the audit, having regard to the interrelationships among the SAs, to Determine whether any audit procedures in addition to those required by the SAs are necessary in pursuance of the objectives stated in the SAs; and Evaluate whether sufficient appropriate audit evidence has been obtained.
Misstatements can arise from error or fraud. preparation and presentation of the financial statements. Certain carefully laid frauds might not be unearthed during the normal course of audit. Generally, test check basis is adopted, not 100% checking. So, some underlying misstatement might remain undetected. Audit is persuasive, not conclusive. Limitations on knowledge of client’s business also poses a problem. Need for the audit to be conducted within a reasonable period of time and at a reasonable cost. 1. 8. 1 Factors affecting inherent limitationsFactors affecting inherent limitations are addressed in other auditing standards. Following are few of the factors: Fraud, particularly fraud involving senior management or collusion. The existence and completeness of related party relationships and transactions. The occurrence of non-compliance with laws and regulations. Future events or conditions that may cause an entity to cease to continue as a going concern. 1. 8. 2 Inherent limitations and Auditors’ responsibilityBecause of the inherent limitations of an audit, there is an unavoidable risk that some material misstatements of the financial statements may not be detected, even though the audit is properly planned and performed in accordance with SAs. Accordingly, the subsequent discovery of a material misstatement of the financial statements resulting from fraud or error does not by itself indicate a failure to conduct an audit in accordance with SAs. Whether the auditor has performed an audit in accordance with SAs is determined by the audit procedures performed in the circumstances, the sufficiency and appropriateness of the audit evidence obtained as a result thereof and the suitability of the auditor’s report based on an evaluation of that evidence in light of the overall objectives of the auditor. The inherent limitations of an audit cannot be a justification for the auditor to be satisfied with less- than-persuasive audit evidence 2. SA 220 Agreeing the Terms of Audit Engagements
The auditor shall agree the terms of the audit engagement with management or those charged with governance, as appropriate through an engagement letter. The following are the broad aspects included in the engagement letter: Terms of Engagement - The official conditions that someone must agree to before they can start to be employed/ engaged by someone. Prepared by – Auditor (Chartered Accountant – Proprietor or Partner of the firm) Signed by – Management (Those charged with governance like CEO or MD) & Auditor Prepared at – Start of the audit Contains - Terms of engagement i. the terms agreed by the auditor with management as to how to conduct the audit. Contents Terms of Engagement Pre-conditions of an Audit Factors affecting independence of audit Engagement Letter Change in terms of engagement What are the requirements of ISA 200?Ethical Requirements Relating to an Audit of Financial Statements.. Professional Skepticism.. Professional Judgment.. Sufficient Appropriate Audit Evidence and Audit Risk.. Conduct of an Audit in Accordance with ISAs.. What are the 5 requirements of the independent auditor to conduct an audit in accordance to CAS?Requirements. The auditor shall comply with relevant ethical requirements: Integrity. Objectivity. Professional competence and due care. Confidentiality. Professional behavior.. The auditor is also subject to the relevant independence and other ethical requirements set out in rules of professional conduct.. What is SA 200 in auditing?SA 200 establishes the independent auditor's overall responsibilities when conducting an audit of financial statements in accordance with SAs. The Standard explains the nature and scope of an audit designed to enable the independent auditor to meet those objectives.
What do independent auditors need?The auditor should be independent from the client company, so that the audit opinion will not be influenced by any relationship between them. The auditors are expected to give an unbiased and honest professional opinion on the financial statements to the shareholders.
|