What does it mean for a gene to be inducible?

Zeitlinger, J. et al. RNA polymerase stalling at developmental control genes in the Drosophila melanogaster embryo. Nature Genet. 39, 1512–1516 (2007).

CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Muse, G. W. et al. RNA polymerase is poised for activation across the genome. Nature Genet. 39, 1507–1511 (2007).

CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Kim, T. H. et al. A high-resolution map of active promoters in the human genome. Nature 436, 876–880 (2005).

CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Guenther, M. G., Levine, S. S., Boyer, L. A., Jaenisch, R. & Young, R. A. A chromatin landmark and transcription initiation at most promoters in human cells. Cell 130, 77–88 (2007).

CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Bernstein, B. E. et al. A bivalent chromatin structure marks key developmental genes in embryonic stem cells. Cell 125, 315–326 (2006).

CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Lee, T. I. et al. Control of developmental regulators by Polycomb in human embryonic stem cells. Cell 125, 301–313 (2006).

CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

de Nadal, E. & Posas, F. Multilayered control of gene expression by stress-activated protein kinases. EMBO J. 29, 4–13 (2010).

CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Fuda, N. J., Ardehali, M. B. & Lis, J. T. Defining mechanisms that regulate RNA polymerase II transcription in vivo. Nature 461, 186–192 (2009).

CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Roeder, R. G. Transcriptional regulation and the role of diverse coactivators in animal cells. FEBS Lett. 579, 909–915 (2005).

CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Ptashne, M. & Gann, A. Transcriptional activation by recruitment. Nature 386, 569–577 (1997).

CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Orphanides, G. & Reinberg, D. A unified theory of gene expression. Cell 108, 439–451 (2002). A comprehensive review of all aspects of gene expression, including those that are not described in this Review, such as transcription elongation, pre-mRNA processing and export and protein translation.

CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Traven, A., Jelicic, B. & Sopta, M. Yeast Gal4: a transcriptional paradigm revisited. EMBO Rep. 7, 496–499 (2006).

CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Brent, R. & Ptashne, M. A eukaryotic transcriptional activator bearing the DNA specificity of a prokaryotic repressor. Cell 43, 729–736 (1985).

CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Wu, Y., Reece, R. J. & Ptashne, M. Quantitation of putative activator–target affinities predicts transcriptional activating potentials. EMBO J. 15, 3951–3963 (1996).

CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Carrozza, M. J., John, S., Sil, A. K., Hopper, J. E. & Workman, J. L. Gal80 confers specificity on HAT complex interactions with activators. J. Biol. Chem. 277, 24648–24652 (2002).

CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Blank, T. E., Woods, M. P., Lebo, C. M., Xin, P. & Hopper, J. E. Novel Gal3 proteins showing altered Gal80p binding cause constitutive transcription of Gal4p-activated genes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol. Cell. Biol. 17, 2566–2575 (1997).

CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Yano, K. & Fukasawa, T. Galactose-dependent reversible interaction of Gal3p with Gal80p in the induction pathway of Gal4p-activated genes of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 94, 1721–1726 (1997).

CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Platt, A. & Reece, R. J. The yeast galactose genetic switch is mediated by the formation of a Gal4p–Gal80p–Gal3p complex. EMBO J. 17, 4086–4091 (1998).

CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Suzuki-Fujimoto, T. et al. Analysis of the galactose signal transduction pathway in Saccharomyces cerevisiae: interaction between Gal3p and Gal80p. Mol. Cell. Biol. 16, 2504–2508 (1996).

CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Zenke, F. T. et al. Activation of Gal4p by galactose-dependent interaction of galactokinase and Gal80p. Science 272, 1662–1665 (1996).

CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Jiang, F., Frey, B. R., Evans, M. L., Friel, J. C. & Hopper, J. E. Gene activation by dissociation of an inhibitor from a transcriptional activation domain. Mol. Cell. Biol. 29, 5604–5610 (2009).

CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Bhaumik, S. R. & Green, M. R. SAGA is an essential in vivo target of the yeast acidic activator Gal4p. Genes Dev. 15, 1935–1945 (2001).

CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Bryant, G. O. & Ptashne, M. Independent recruitment in vivo by Gal4 of two complexes required for transcription. Mol. Cell 11, 1301–1309 (2003).

CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Larschan, E. & Winston, F. The S. cerevisiae SAGA complex functions in vivo as a coactivator for transcriptional activation by Gal4. Genes Dev. 15, 1946–1956 (2001).

CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Kuras, L., Borggrefe, T. & Kornberg, R. D. Association of the Mediator complex with enhancers of active genes. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 100, 13887–13891 (2003).

CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Ansari, A. Z. et al. Transcriptional activating regions target a cyclin-dependent kinase. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 99, 14706–14709 (2002).

CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Koh, S. S., Ansari, A. Z., Ptashne, M. & Young, R. A. An activator target in the RNA polymerase II holoenzyme. Mol. Cell 1, 895–904 (1998).

CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Lemieux, K. & Gaudreau, L. Targeting of Swi/Snf to the yeast GAL1 UAS G requires the Mediator, TAFIIs, and RNA polymerase II. EMBO J. 23, 4040–4050 (2004).

CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Bhaumik, S. R. & Green, M. R. Differential requirement of SAGA components for recruitment of TATA-box-binding protein to promoters in vivo. Mol. Cell. Biol. 22, 7365–7371 (2002).

CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Larschan, E. & Winston, F. The Saccharomyces cerevisiae Srb8–Srb11 complex functions with the SAGA complex during Gal4-activated transcription. Mol. Cell Biol. 25, 114–123 (2005).

CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Fischer, J. A., Giniger, E., Maniatis, T. & Ptashne, M. GAL4 activates transcription in Drosophila. Nature 332, 853–856 (1988).

CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Kakidani, H. & Ptashne, M. GAL4 activates gene expression in mammalian cells. Cell 52, 161–167 (1988).

CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

De Val, S. et al. Combinatorial regulation of endothelial gene expression by ets and forkhead transcription factors. Cell 135, 1053–1064 (2008).

Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Rhodius, V. A. & Busby, S. J. Positive activation of gene expression. Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 1, 152–159 (1998).

CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Campos, E. I. & Reinberg, D. Histones: annotating chromatin. Annu. Rev. Genet. 43, 559–599 (2009).

CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Archer, T. K., Cordingley, M. G., Wolford, R. G. & Hager, G. L. Transcription factor access is mediated by accurately positioned nucleosomes on the mouse mammary tumor virus promoter. Mol. Cell. Biol. 11, 688–698 (1991).

CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Workman, J. L. & Roeder, R. G. Binding of transcription factor TFIID to the major late promoter during in vitro nucleosome assembly potentiates subsequent initiation by RNA polymerase II. Cell 51, 613–622 (1987).

CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Lorch, Y., LaPointe, J. W. & Kornberg, R. D. Nucleosomes inhibit the initiation of transcription but allow chain elongation with the displacement of histones. Cell 49, 203–210 (1987).

CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Knezetic, J. A. & Luse, D. S. The presence of nucleosomes on a DNA template prevents initiation by RNA polymerase II in vitro. Cell 45, 95–104 (1986).

CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Cairns, B. R. The logic of chromatin architecture and remodelling at promoters. Nature 461, 193–198 (2009).

CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Grant, P. A. et al. Yeast Gcn5 functions in two multisubunit complexes to acetylate nucleosomal histones: characterization of an Ada complex and the SAGA (Spt/Ada) complex. Genes Dev. 11, 1640–1650 (1997).

CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Steger, D. J., Eberharter, A., John, S., Grant, P. A. & Workman, J. L. Purified histone acetyltransferase complexes stimulate HIV-1 transcription from preassembled nucleosomal arrays. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 95, 12924–12929 (1998).

CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Ikeda, K., Steger, D. J., Eberharter, A. & Workman, J. L. Activation domain-specific and general transcription stimulation by native histone acetyltransferase complexes. Mol. Cell. Biol. 19, 855–863 (1999).

CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Casamassimi, A. & Napoli, C. Mediator complexes and eukaryotic transcription regulation: an overview. Biochimie 89, 1439–1446 (2007).

CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Kimbrel, E. A. et al. Systematic in vivo structure-function analysis of p300 in hematopoiesis. Blood 114, 4804–4812 (2009).

CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Jiang, H. et al. PCAF interacts with Tax and stimulates Tax transactivation in a histone acetyltransferase-independent manner. Mol. Cell. Biol. 19, 8136–8145 (1999).

CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Qiu, H. et al. An array of coactivators is required for optimal recruitment of TATA binding protein and RNA polymerase II by promoter-bound Gcn4p. Mol. Cell. Biol. 24, 4104–4117 (2004).

CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Clapier, C. R. & Cairns, B. R. The biology of chromatin remodeling complexes. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 78, 273–304 (2009).

CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Bryant, G. O. et al. Activator control of nucleosome occupancy in activation and repression of transcription. PLoS Biol. 6, 2928–2939 (2008). The authors show that there are two mechanisms of nucleosome loss from the Gal genes following exposure to galactose, one of which is dependent on activator-mediated recruitment of the nucleosome-remodelling complex SWI/SNF and a slower pathway that is independent of SWI/SNF. They also confirm that repression can occur at Gal genes in both the presence and absence of nucleosomes, showing that nucleosomes are not essential for repression at inducible promoters.

CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Yudkovsky, N., Logie, C., Hahn, S. & Peterson, C. L. Recruitment of the SWI/SNF chromatin remodeling complex by transcriptional activators. Genes Dev. 13, 2369–2374 (1999).

CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Soutoglou, E. & Talianidis, I. Coordination of PIC assembly and chromatin remodeling during differentiation-induced gene activation. Science 295, 1901–1904 (2002).

CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Hassan, A. H., Neely, K. E. & Workman, J. L. Histone acetyltransferase complexes stabilize SWI/SNF binding to promoter nucleosomes. Cell 104, 817–827 (2001).

CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Hassan, A. H. et al. Function and selectivity of bromodomains in anchoring chromatin-modifying complexes to promoter nucleosomes. Cell 111, 369–379 (2002).

CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Chandy, M., Gutierrez, J. L., Prochasson, P. & Workman, J. L. SWI/SNF displaces SAGA-acetylated nucleosomes. Eukaryot. Cell 5, 1738–1747 (2006).

CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Carey, M., Li, B. & Workman, J. L. RSC exploits histone acetylation to abrogate the nucleosomal block to RNA polymerase II elongation. Mol. Cell 24, 481–487 (2006).

CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Reinke, H. & Horz, W. Histones are first hyperacetylated and then lose contact with the activated PHO5 promoter. Mol. Cell 11, 1599–1607 (2003).

CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Steger, D. J., Haswell, E. S., Miller, A. L., Wente, S. R. & O'Shea, E. K. Regulation of chromatin remodeling by inositol polyphosphates. Science 299, 114–116 (2003).

CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Sharma, V. M., Li, B. & Reese, J. C. SWI/SNF-dependent chromatin remodeling of RNR3 requires TAFIIs and the general transcription machinery. Genes Dev. 17, 502–515 (2003).

CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

He, Q., Battistella, L. & Morse, R. H. Mediator requirement downstream of chromatin remodeling during transcriptional activation of CHA1 in yeast. J. Biol. Chem. 283, 5276–5286 (2008).

CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Zhang, H. & Reese, J. C. Exposing the core promoter is sufficient to activate transcription and alter coactivator requirement at RNR3. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 104, 8833–8838 (2007).

CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Adkins, M. W. & Tyler, J. K. Transcriptional activators are dispensable for transcription in the absence of Spt6-mediated chromatin reassembly of promoter regions. Mol. Cell 21, 405–416 (2006).

CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Schwabish, M. A. & Struhl, K. Evidence for eviction and rapid deposition of histones upon transcriptional elongation by RNA polymerase II. Mol. Cell. Biol. 24, 10111–10117 (2004).

CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Lee, C. K., Shibata, Y., Rao, B., Strahl, B. D. & Lieb, J. D. Evidence for nucleosome depletion at active regulatory regions genome-wide. Nature Genet. 36, 900–905 (2004).

CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Petesch, S. J. & Lis, J. T. Rapid, transcription-independent loss of nucleosomes over a large chromatin domain at Hsp70 loci. Cell 134, 74–84 (2008). This D. melanogaster study shows that heat shock induces a rapid loss of nucleosomes across the entire Hsp70 locus, and that this nucleosome loss occurs before and is independent of transcription. This is a key finding because it indicates that, although nucleosome disruption is required for optimal levels of Hsp70 expression, nucleosome loss on its own is not sufficient to activate transcription.

CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Wu, C., Wong, Y. C. & Elgin, S. C. The chromatin structure of specific genes: II. Disruption of chromatin structure during gene activity. Cell 16, 807–814 (1979).

CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Wu, C. The 5′ ends of Drosophila heat shock genes in chromatin are hypersensitive to DNase I. Nature 286, 854–860 (1980).

CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Lis, J. T. Imaging Drosophila gene activation and polymerase pausing in vivo. Nature 450, 198–202 (2007).

CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Winegarden, N. A., Wong, K. S., Sopta, M. & Westwood, J. T. Sodium salicylate decreases intracellular ATP, induces both heat shock factor binding and chromosomal puffing, but does not induce hsp 70 gene transcription in Drosophila. J. Biol. Chem. 271, 26971–26980 (1996).

CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Han, M. & Grunstein, M. Nucleosome loss activates yeast downstream promoters in vivo. Cell 55, 1137–1145 (1988). One of the first studies to show that nucleosome loss could activate transcription in vivo . Using a genetic approach, the authors inactivated histone H4 and found that the promoters of several genes were activated and transcription was initiated independently of the presence of transcriptional activators.

CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Wang, L., Liu, L. & Berger, S. L. Critical residues for histone acetylation by Gcn5, functioning in Ada and SAGA complexes, are also required for transcriptional function in vivo. Genes Dev. 12, 640–653 (1998).

CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Kao, C. F. et al. Rad6 plays a role in transcriptional activation through ubiquitylation of histone H2B. Genes Dev. 18, 184–195 (2004).

CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Kim, J. et al. RAD6-mediated transcription-coupled H2B ubiquitylation directly stimulates H3K4 methylation in human cells. Cell 137, 459–471 (2009).

CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Hwang, W. W. et al. A conserved RING finger protein required for histone H2B monoubiquitination and cell size control. Mol. Cell 11, 261–266 (2003).

CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Wood, A., Schneider, J., Dover, J., Johnston, M. & Shilatifard, A. The Paf1 complex is essential for histone monoubiquitination by the Rad6–Bre1 complex, which signals for histone methylation by COMPASS and Dot1p. J. Biol. Chem. 278, 34739–34742 (2003).

CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Robzyk, K., Recht, J. & Osley, M. A. Rad6-dependent ubiquitination of histone H2B in yeast. Science 287, 501–504 (2000).

CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Wood, A. et al. Bre1, an E3 ubiquitin ligase required for recruitment and substrate selection of Rad6 at a promoter. Mol. Cell 11, 267–274 (2003).

CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Ng, H. H., Dole, S. & Struhl, K. The Rtf1 component of the Paf1 transcriptional elongation complex is required for ubiquitination of histone H2B. J. Biol. Chem. 278, 33625–33628 (2003).

CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Xiao, T. et al. Histone H2B ubiquitylation is associated with elongating RNA polymerase II. Mol. Cell. Biol. 25, 637–651 (2005).

CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Weake, V. M. & Workman, J. L. Histone ubiquitination: triggering gene activity. Mol. Cell 29, 653–663 (2008).

CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Henry, K. W. et al. Transcriptional activation via sequential histone H2B ubiquitylation and deubiquitylation, mediated by SAGA-associated Ubp8. Genes Dev. 17, 2648–2663 (2003).

CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Daniel, J. A. et al. Deubiquitination of histone H2B by a yeast acetyltransferase complex regulates transcription. J. Biol. Chem. 279, 1867–1871 (2004).

CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Wyce, A. et al. H2B ubiquitylation acts as a barrier to Ctk1 nucleosomal recruitment prior to removal by Ubp8 within a SAGA-related complex. Mol. Cell 27, 275–288 (2007).

CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Saunders, A., Core, L. J. & Lis, J. T. Breaking barriers to transcription elongation. Nature Rev. Mol. Cell. Biol. 7, 557–567 (2006).

CAS  Google Scholar 

Rougvie, A. E. & Lis, J. T. The RNA polymerase II molecule at the 5′ end of the uninduced hsp70 gene of D. melanogaster is transcriptionally engaged. Cell 54, 795–804 (1988).

CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Lis, J. T., Mason, P., Peng, J., Price, D. H. & Werner, J. P-TEFb kinase recruitment and function at heat shock loci. Genes Dev. 14, 792–803 (2000).

CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Renner, D. B., Yamaguchi, Y., Wada, T., Handa, H. & Price, D. H. A highly purified RNA polymerase II elongation control system. J. Biol. Chem. 276, 42601–42609 (2001).

CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Law, A., Hirayoshi, K., O'Brien, T. & Lis, J. T. Direct cloning of DNA that interacts in vivo with a specific protein: application to RNA polymerase II and sites of pausing in Drosophila. Nucleic Acids Res. 26, 919–924 (1998).

CAS  Google Scholar 

Boettiger, A. N. & Levine, M. Synchronous and stochastic patterns of gene activation in the Drosophila embryo. Science 325, 471–473 (2009). This paper provides important clues into the possible reason for the presence of paused Pol II on the promoters of developmental control genes. Using in situ hybridizations, the authors found that genes with paused Pol II are activated more synchronously in different cells of the same tissue compared with genes at which the rate-limiting step in transcription occurs at the level of activator-dependent recruitment.

CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Lee, C. et al. NELF and GAGA factor are linked to promoter-proximal pausing at many genes in Drosophila. Mol. Cell. Biol. 28, 3290–3300 (2008).

CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Nechaev, S. et al. Global analysis of short RNAs reveals widespread promoter-proximal stalling and arrest of Pol II in Drosophila. Science 327, 335–338 (2010). This recent study found that short RNAs derived from stalled or paused Pol II are associated with approximately one-third of all D. melanogaster genes. These findings suggest that polymerase pausing might be a general feature of the early stages in the transcription cycle, even if it is not necessarily rate-limiting for all genes.

CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

de Nadal, E., Casadome, L. & Posas, F. Targeting the MEF2-like transcription factor Smp1 by the stress-activated Hog1 mitogen-activated protein kinase. Mol. Cell. Biol. 23, 229–237 (2003).

CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Proft, M. et al. Regulation of the Sko1 transcriptional repressor by the Hog1 MAP kinase in response to osmotic stress. EMBO J. 20, 1123–1133 (2001).

CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Alepuz, P. M., de Nadal, E., Zapater, M., Ammerer, G. & Posas, F. Osmostress-induced transcription by Hot1 depends on a Hog1-mediated recruitment of the RNA Pol II. EMBO J. 22, 2433–2442 (2003). This study showed that, surprisingly, phosphorylation of the target substrate of the Hog1 MAPK in yeast is not required for transcription activation at some genes. Instead recruitment of the MAPK itself is the key step required to activate transcription because artificial tethering of the MAPK to the promoter is sufficient to mediate stress-responsive activation at these genes.

CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Alepuz, P. M., Jovanovic, A., Reiser, V. & Ammerer, G. Stress-induced MAP kinase Hog1 is part of transcription activation complexes. Mol. Cell 7, 767–777 (2001).

CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Vicent, G. P. et al. Induction of progesterone target genes requires activation of Erk and Msk kinases and phosphorylation of histone H3. Mol. Cell 24, 367–381 (2006).

CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Zhang, H. M. et al. Mitogen-induced recruitment of ERK and MSK to SRE promoter complexes by ternary complex factor Elk-1. Nucleic Acids Res. 36, 2594–2607 (2008).

CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Hu, S. et al. Profiling the human protein–DNA interactome reveals ERK2 as a transcriptional repressor of interferon signaling. Cell 139, 610–622 (2009).

CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Proft, M. et al. The stress-activated Hog1 kinase is a selective transcriptional elongation factor for genes responding to osmotic stress. Mol. Cell 23, 241–250 (2006).

CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Pascual-Ahuir, A., Struhl, K. & Proft, M. Genome-wide location analysis of the stress-activated MAP kinase Hog1 in yeast. Methods 40, 272–278 (2006).

CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Pokholok, D. K., Zeitlinger, J., Hannett, N. M., Reynolds, D. B. & Young, R. A. Activated signal transduction kinases frequently occupy target genes. Science 313, 533–536 (2006).

CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Mas, G. et al. Recruitment of a chromatin remodelling complex by the Hog1 MAP kinase to stress genes. EMBO J. 28, 326–336 (2009).

CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Lawrence, M. C. et al. Multiple chromatin-bound protein kinases assemble factors that regulate insulin gene transcription. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 106, 22181–22186 (2009). This paper shows that multiple MAPKs bind to the promoter of the insulin gene in human pancreatic β -cells in the presence of the proinflammatory cytokine IL-1 β . MAPKs at promoters of target genes might facilitate rapid switches in gene activation statusbecause these kinases promote activation or repression of insulin transcription depending on the glucose levels in the cellular environment.

D'Alessio, J. A., Wright, K. J. & Tjian, R. Shifting players and paradigms in cell-specific transcription. Mol. Cell 36, 924–931 (2009).

CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Egloff, S. & Murphy, S. Cracking the RNA polymerase II CTD code. Trends Genet. 24, 280–288 (2008).

CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Zimarino, V. & Wu, C. Induction of sequence-specific binding of Drosophila heat shock activator protein without protein synthesis. Nature 327, 727–730 (1987).

CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Westwood, J. T., Clos, J. & Wu, C. Stress-induced oligomerization and chromosomal relocalization of heat-shock factor. Nature 353, 822–827 (1991).

CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Tulin, A. & Spradling, A. Chromatin loosening by poly(ADP)-ribose polymerase (PARP) at Drosophila puff loci. Science 299, 560–562 (2003).

Google Scholar 

Tsukiyama, T., Becker, P. B. & Wu, C. ATP-dependent nucleosome disruption at a heat-shock promoter mediated by binding of GAGA transcription factor. Nature 367, 525–532 (1994).

CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Wang, Y. V., Tang, H. & Gilmour, D. S. Identification in vivo of different rate-limiting steps associated with transcriptional activators in the presence and absence of a GAGA element. Mol. Cell. Biol. 25, 3543–3552 (2005).

CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Lee, H., Kraus, K. W., Wolfner, M. F. & Lis, J. T. DNA sequence requirements for generating paused polymerase at the start of hsp70. Genes Dev. 6, 284–295 (1992).

CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Wu, C. H. et al. Molecular characterization of Drosophila NELF. Nucleic Acids Res. 33, 1269–1279 (2005).

CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Wu, C. H. et al. NELF and DSIF cause promoter proximal pausing on the hsp70 promoter in Drosophila. Genes Dev. 17, 1402–1414 (2003).

CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Park, J. M., Werner, J., Kim, J. M., Lis, J. T. & Kim, Y. J. Mediator, not holoenzyme, is directly recruited to the heat shock promoter by HSF upon heat shock. Mol. Cell 8, 9–19 (2001).

CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Kim, J., Hake, S. B. & Roeder, R. G. The human homolog of yeast BRE1 functions as a transcriptional coactivator through direct activator interactions. Mol. Cell 20, 759–770 (2005).

CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Shilatifard, A. Chromatin modifications by methylation and ubiquitination: implications in the regulation of gene expression. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 75, 243–269 (2006).

CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Lee, J. S. et al. Histone crosstalk between H2B monoubiquitination and H3 methylation mediated by COMPASS. Cell 131, 1084–1096 (2007).

CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar