The best method for determining the risk of aspiration in a patient with a tracheostomy is to

The best method for determining the risk of aspiration in a patient with a tracheostomy is to

As with any surgery, there are some risks associated with tracheotomies. However, serious infections are rare.

Early Complications that may arise during the tracheostomy procedure or soon thereafter include:

  • Bleeding
  • Air trapped around the lungs (pneumothorax)
  • Air trapped in the deeper layers of the chest(pneumomediastinum)
  • Air trapped underneath the skin around the tracheostomy (subcutaneous emphysema)
  • Damage to the swallowing tube (esophagus)
  • Injury to the nerve that moves the vocal cords (recurrent laryngeal nerve)
  • Tracheostomy tube can be blocked by blood clots, mucus or pressure of the airway walls.  Blockages can be prevented by suctioning, humidifying the air, and selecting the appropriate tracheostomy tube.

Many of these early complications can be avoided or dealt with appropriately with our experienced surgeons in a hospital setting.

Over time, other complications may arise from the surgery.

Later Complications that may occur while the tracheostomy tube is in place include:

  • Accidental removal of the tracheostomy tube (accidental decannulation)
  • Infection in the trachea and around the tracheostomy tube
  • Windpipe itself may become damaged for a number of reasons, including pressure from the tube; bacteria that cause infections and form scar tissue; or friction from a tube that moves too much

These complications can usually be prevented or quickly dealt with if the caregiver has proper knowledge of how to care for the tracheostomy site.

Delayed Complications that may result after longer-term presence of a tracheostomy include:

  • Thinning (erosion) of the trachea from the tube rubbing against it (tracheomalacia)
  • Development of a small connection from the trachea (windpipe) to the esophagus (swallowing tube) which is called a tracheo-esophageal fistula
  • Development of bumps (granulation tissue) that may need to be surgically removed before decannulation (removal of trach tube) can occur
  • Narrowing or collapse of the airway above the site of the tracheostomy, possibly requiring an additional surgical procedure to repair it
  • Once the tracheostomy tube is removed, the opening may not close on its own.  Tubes remaining in place for 16 weeks or longer are more at risk for needing surgical closure

A clean tracheostomy site, good tracheostomy tube care and regular examination of the airway by an otolaryngologist should minimize the occurrence of any of these complications.

High-risk groups

The risks associated with tracheostomies are higher in the following groups of patients:

  • children, especially newborns and infants
  • smokers
  • alcohol abusers
  • diabetics
  • immunocompromised patients
  • persons with chronic diseases or respiratory infections
  • persons taking steroids or cortisone

Having a tracheostomy usually will not affect the patient's eating or swallowing patterns. Sometimes there are changes in swallowing dynamics that require adjusting to, but it is rare that this cannot be overcome in a short time. If swallowing problems do occur, it is usually due to limited elevation of the larynx or poor closure of the epiglottis and vocal cords, which allows food or fluids into the trachea. Your otolaryngologist and speech pathologists can be consulted for an evaluation, which may include a videofluoroscopic swallowing study or other procedures to make sure the patient is swallowing safely. The speech pathologist may be able to develop ways to improve swallowing if there is a problem.

Indications of a Swallowing Problem

  • Difficulty or refusing to eat
  • Over-reaction or no reaction to food in the mouth
  • Choking and coughing while eating or drinking
  • Vomiting
  • Evidence of food in tracheostomy secretions
  • Excessive drooling
  • Large amounts of watery secretions from trach
  • Congested lung sounds
  • Frequent respiratory infections

If the patient eats by mouth, it is recommended that the tracheostomy tube be suctioned prior to eating. This often prevents the need for suctioning during or after meals, which may stimulate excessive coughing and could result in vomiting.

Encouraging fluid intake is helpful for a patient with a tracheostomy. Increased fluid intake will thin and loosen secretions making coughing and suctioning easier.

Always observe the patient while eating to be sure food does not get into the trach.

1. Marik PE. Aspiration pneumonitis and aspiration pneumonia [see comment] N Engl J Med. 2001;344:665–671. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

2. Potts RG, Zaroukian MH, Guerrero PA, et al. Comparison of blue dye visualization and glucose oxidase test strip methods for detecting pulmonary aspiration of enteral feedings in intubated adults. Chest. 1993;103:117–121. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

3. Winterbauer RH, Durning RBJ, Barron E, et al. Aspirated nasogastric feeding solution detected by glucose strips. Ann Intern Med. 1981;95:67–68. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

4. Metheny NA, Dahms TE, Stewart BJ, et al. Efficacy of dye-stained enteral formula in detecting pulmonary aspiration. Chest. 2002;121:1–6. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

5. Kinsey GC, Murray MJ, Swensen SJ, et al. Glucose content of tracheal aspirates: Implications for the detection of tube feeding aspiration. Crit Care Med. 1994;22:1557–1562. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

6. Elpern EH, Jacobs ER, Tangney C, et al. Nonspecificity of glucose reagent strips as a marker of formula. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1986;131:A288. [Google Scholar]

7. Metheny NA, Dahms TE, Stewart BJ, et al. Verification of inefficacy of the glucose method in detecting aspiration associated with tube feedings. Med Surg Nursing. 2005;14:112–121. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

8. McClave SA, Lukan JK, Stefater JA, et al. Poor validity of residual volumes as a marker for risk of aspiration in critically ill patients [see comment] Crit Care Med. 2005;33:324–330. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

9. Drakulovic MB, Torres A, Bauer TT, et al. Supine body position as a risk factor for nosocomial pneumonia in mechanically ventilated patients: A randomised trial. Lancet. 1999;354:1851–1858. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

10. Cook DJ, Walter SD, Cook RJ, et al. Incidence of and risk factors for ventilator-associated pneumonia in critically ill patients. Ann Intern Med. 1998;129:433–440. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

11. Torres A, Serra-Batlles J, Ros E, et al. Pulmonary aspiration of gastric contents in patients receiving mechanical ventilation: The effect of body position. Ann Intern Med. 1992;116:540–543. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

12. Yavagal DR, Karnad DR, Oak JL. Metoclopramide for preventing pneumonia in critically ill patients receiving enteral tube feeding: a randomized controlled trial. Crit Care Med. 2000;28:1408–1411. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

13. Metheny NA, Dahms TE, Chang YH, et al. Detection of pepsin in tracheal secretions after forced small-volume aspirations of gastric juice. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 2004;28:79–84. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

14. Luna CM, Blanzaco D, Niederman MS, et al. Resolution of ventilator-associated pneumonia: Prospective evaluation of the clinical pulmonary infection score as an early clinical predictor of outcome [see comment] Crit Care Med. 2003;31:676–682. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

15. de Lemos J, Tweeddale M, Chittock D. Measuring quality of sedation in adult mechanically ventilated critically ill patients: The Vancouver Interaction and Calmness Scale Sedation Focus Group. J Clin Epidemiol. 2000;53:908–919. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

16. Tablan OC, Anderson LJ, Besser R, et al. Guidelines for preventing health-care–associated pneumonia, 2003: Recommendations of CDC and the Healthcare Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee. MMWR Morbid Mortal Wkly Rep Recom Rep. 2004;53:1–36. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

17. McClave SA, DeMeo MT, DeLegge MH, et al. North American Summit on Aspiration in the Critically Ill Patient: Consensus statement. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 2002;26(6 Suppl):S80–S85. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

18. Papazian L, Bregeon F, Thirion X, et al. Effect of ventilator-associated pneumonia on mortality and morbidity. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1996;154:91–97. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

19. Fagon JY, Chastre J, Vuagnat A, et al. Nosocomial pneumonia and mortality among patients in intensive care units. JAMA. 1996;275:866–869. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

20. Grap MJ, Cantley M, Munro CL, et al. Use of backrest elevation in critical care: A pilot study. Am J Crit Care. 1999;8:475–480. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

21. Adnet F, Baud F. Relation between Glasgow Coma Scale and aspiration pneumonia. Lancet. 1996;348:123–124. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

22. Marik PE, Zaloga GP. Gastric versus post-pyloric feeding: A systematic review. Crit Care (London) 2003;7:R46–R51. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

23. Metheny NA, Stewart J, Nuetzel G, et al. Effect of feeding-tube properties on residual volume measurements in tube-fed patients. J Parent Enter Nutr. 2005;29:192–197. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

24. Kuo B, Castell DO. The effect of nasogastric intubation on gastroesophageal reflux: A comparison of different tube sizes. Am J Gastroenterol. 1995;90:1804–1807. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

25. Hassett JM, Sunby C, Flint LM. No elimination of aspiration pneumonia in neurologically disabled patients with feeding gastrostomy. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1988;167:383–388. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

26. Akca O, Koltka K, Uzel S, et al. Risk factors for early-onset, ventilator-associated pneumonia in critical care patients: Selected multiresistant versus nonresistant bacteria [see comment] Anesthesiology. 2000;93:638–645. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

27. Schmidt J, Holas M, Halvorson K, et al. Video-fluoroscopic evidence of aspiration predicts pneumonia and death but not dehydration following stroke. Dysphagia. 1994;9:7–11. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

28. Orozco-Levi M, Torres A, Ferrer M, et al. Semirecumbent position protects from pulmonary aspiration but not completely from gastroesophageal reflux in mechanically ventilated patients. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1995;152(4 Pt 1):1387–1390. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

29. Rello J, Ollendorf DA, Oster G, et al. Epidemiology and outcomes of ventilator-associated pneumonia in a large US database [see comment] CHEST. 2002;122:2115–2121. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

30. Schurink CA, van Nieuwenhoven CA, Jacobs JA, et al. Clinical pulmonary infection score for ventilator-associated pneumonia: accuracy and inter-observer variability. Intensive Care Med. 2004;30:217–224. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]


Page 2

VariableNo. (%) of Patients
Final sample360
Enrolled but failed to complete study because of186
 Extubation104
 Discontinuation of tube feedings28
 Death or withdrawal of care27
 Problems with specimen preparation or storage20
 Lapse in data collection due to inclement weather4
 Withdrawal of consent from family3
Age, yrs, mean ± SD (range)52.2 ± 18.1 (18–95)
Gender
 Male215 (59.7)
 Female145 (40.3)
Intensive care unit from which enrolled:
 Trauma/surgery121 (33.6)
 Neurosurgery/neuromedicine115 (31.9)
 General medicine58 (16.1)
 Cardiac surgery38 (10.6)
 Cardiac medicine28 (7.8)
APACHE II score on admission, mean ± SD (range)22.8 ± 6.3 (8–41)
GERD diagnosed prior to admission30 (8.3)
Gastroparesis diagnosed prior to admission2 (0.6)