After the lesson, have each student record three things he or she learned from the lesson. 2. TwoNext, have students record two things that they found interesting and that they’d like to learn more about. 3. OneThen, have students record one question they still have about the material. 4. ReviewFinally, the most important step is to review the students’ responses. You can use this information to help develop future lessons and determine if some of the material needs to be taught again. *For Primary Grades PK-1, this strategy should be used in whole-group rather than as an independent task, with the teacher charting ideas. Of course, since many children will want to participate, there might be more than 3-2-1 ideas/questions in each section. When to UseUse Three-Two-One at any time during a lesson to encourage students to think about their learning:
VariationsCompare and Contrast 3-2-1As a way to compare and contrast, have students record three similarities between two items, two differences, and one question they still have about them. Reading 3-2-1When reading, have students record three of the most important ideas from the text, two supporting details for each of the ideas, and one question they have about each of the ideas. Pyramid 3-2-1Have the students create a triangle and divide it into three sections horizontally. In the bottom section, the students record three things they learned for the day. In the middle section, the students record two questions they have. In the top section, the students describe how the information learned is applicable to their everyday lives. Academic Vocabulary 3-2-1To increase comprehension and use of academic language, ask students to explore a concept through 3-2-1. First, have them speak with a partner. Provide the structure for 3 minutes of conversation using targeted academic language. Then, ask students to write 2 sentences using the language. Finally, have students read 1 paragraph which contains the targeted vocabulary. Print This Tool Council for Exceptional Children, the Division for Learning Disabilities (DLD) and the Division for Research (DR). Fluency Instruction. Dowhower, S. (1989) Repeated reading: Research into practice. The Reading Teacher, 42(7), 502-507. Hudson, R.F., Lane, H.B., & Pullen, P.C. (2005). Reading Fluency Assessment and Instruction: What, Why, and How?. The Reading Teacher, 58(8), 702-714. Johns, J. & Berglund, R. (2002). Fluency: Question, answers, evidence-based strategies. Dubuque, IO: Kendall/Hunt Publishing Company. Kuhn, M. (2004). Helping students become accurate, expressive readers: Fluency instruction for small groups. The Reading Teacher, 58(4), 338-344. Lee, J., & Yoon, S. Y. (2017). The Effects of Repeated Reading on Reading Fluency for Students With Reading Disabilities: A Meta-Analysis. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 50(2), 213–224. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022219415605194 Murray, B. (1999). Two Methods for Developing Fluency. Rasinski, T. (2003) The fluent reader: Oral reading strategies for building word recognition, fluency, and comprehension. New York, NY: Scholastic Professional Books. Samuels, S. J. (2002). Reading fluency: It's development and assessment. In Farstrup, A. & Samuels, S. (Ed.). What research has to say about reading instruction (pp. 166-183). Newark, Delaware: International Reading Association. Samuels, S. J. (1997). The method of repeated readings. The Reading Teacher, 50(5), 376-381. Therrien, W. J. (2004). Fluency and Comprehension Gains as a Result of Repeated Reading: A Meta-Analysis. Remedial and Special Education, 25(4), 252–261. https://doi.org/10.1177/07419325040250040801 Vaca, R. & Vaca, J. (1999). Content area reading: Literacy and learning across the curriculum, 6th edition. New York, NY: Logman. |