Which of the types of related literature systematically examines past events to give an account of what has happened in the past?

• Barthes, R. (2005). Criticism and truth. Translated and edited by K. P. Keueman. London: Continuum International Publishing Group.

  Google Scholar 

• Beatty, J. (2011). The lost history of 1914: How the Great War was not inevitable. London: Bloomsbury.

  Google Scholar 

• Becuwe, S., Blancheton, D., & Charles, L. (2012). The decline of French trade power during the first globalization (1850–1913) (pp. 2012–2022). Cahiers du Gretha: Université de Bordeaux.

• Belich, J. (2009). Replenishing the earth: The settler revolution and the rise of the Angle-World 1783–1939. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  Book  Google Scholar 

• Bell, A. R., & Dale, R. S. (2011). The medieval pilgrimage business. Enterprise and Society, 12(3), 601–627.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Berlin, I. (1960). History and theory. The concept of scientific history. History and Theory, 1(1), 1–31.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Bloch, M. (1954). The historian’s craft. Translated Peter Putman. Manchester: Manchester University Press.

  Google Scholar 

• Boole, G. (2003). [1854] An investigation of the laws of thought, on which are founded the mathematical theories of logic and probabilities. Amherst: Prometheus Books.

  Google Scholar 

• Brown, P. (2012). Through the eye of a needle: Wealth, the fall of Rome and the making of Christianity in the West 350–550 AD. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

  Book  Google Scholar 

• Buckley, P. J., & Artisien, P. (1987). North-south direct investment in the European communities: The employment impact of direct investment by British, French and German multinationals in Greece, Portugal and Spain. Basingstoke: Macmillan.

  Book  Google Scholar 

• Buckley, P. J., Casson, M. C., & Gulamhussen, M. A. (2002). Internationalisation—Real options, knowledge management and the Uppsala Approach. In V. Havila, M. Forsgren, & H. Hakansson (Eds.), Critical perspectives on internationalisation (pp. 229–261). Oxford: Elsevier.

  Google Scholar 

• Buckley, P. J., Devinney, T. M., & Louviere, J. J. (2007). Do managers behave the way theory suggests? A choice-theoretic examination of foreign direct investment location decision-making. Journal of International Business Studies, 38(7), 1069–1094.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Buckley, P J., Newbould, G. D., & Thurwell, J. (1978). Going international—The experience of smaller companies overseas. London: Associated Business Press/New York: Halsted Press.

• Buckley, P. J., Pass, C. L., & Prescott, K. (1992). Servicing international markets: Competitive strategies of firms. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.

  Google Scholar 

• Buckley, P. J., & Pearce, R. D. (1991). International aspects of UK economic activities: Reviews of UK statistical sources. Review No 44, Volume XXVI Royal Statistical Society/Economic and Social Research Council. London: Chapman and Hall.

• Burgelman, R. A. (2011). Bridging history and reductionism: A key role for longitudinal qualitative research. Journal of International Business Studies, 42(5), 591–601.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Butterfield, H. (1965). The Whig interpretation of history. New York: W. W. Norton & Company Inc. (Original 1931).

• Cairncross, A. (1953). Home and foreign investment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  Google Scholar 

• Cannadine, D. (2013). The undivided past: History beyond our differences. London: Allen Lane.

  Google Scholar 

• Casson, M. (2009). The world’s first railway system. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  Book  Google Scholar 

• Chandler, A. D. (1962). Strategy and structure: Chapters in the history of the American industrial enterprise. Cambridge: MIT Press.

  Google Scholar 

• Chandler, A. D. (1984). Comparative business history. In D. C. Coleman & P. Mathias (Eds.), Enterprise and history: Essays in honour of Charles Wilson (pp. 473–503). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  Google Scholar 

• Chitu, L., Eichengreen, B., & Mehl, A. J. (2013). History, gravity and international finance. National Bureau of Economic Research Working paper 18697, Washington D.C.

• Clark, C. (2012). The sleepwalkers: How Europe went to war in 1914. London: Allen Lane.

  Google Scholar 

• Clark, P., & Rowlinson, M. (2004). The treatment of history in organisation studies: Towards an ‘historic turn’? Business History, 43(3), 331–352.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Collier, D., Brady, H. E., & Seawright, J. (2010). Sources of leverage in causal inference: Towards an alternative view of methodology. In H. E. Brady & D. Collier (Eds.), Rethinking social enquiry: Diverse tools, shared standards (2nd ed., pp. 229–266). New York: Rowman and Lillefield.

  Google Scholar 

• Cowley, R. (Ed.). (1999). What if?. New York: G.P. Putnam’s Sons.

  Google Scholar 

• Deaton, A. (2009). Instruments of development: Randomization in the tropics, and the search for the elusive keys to economic development. The Keynes Lecture. London: British Academy.

  Google Scholar 

• Decker, S. (2013). The silence of the archive: Post-colonialism and the practice of historical reconstruction from archival evidence. Management and Organisational History, 8(2), 155–173.

  Google Scholar 

• Derrida, J. (1994). Specters of Marx. Translated Peggy Kamuf. New York: Routledge.

  Google Scholar 

• Diebolt, C. (2012). The cliometric voice. Association Française de Cliométrie. Working paper No. 12.

• Dunning, T. (2012). Natural experiments in the social sciences. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  Book  Google Scholar 

• Durand, R., & Vaara, E. (2009). Causation, counterfactuals and competitive advantage. Strategic Management Journal, 30(12), 1245–1264.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Easterlin, R. A. (2013). Cross sections are history. IZA discussion paper No. 7341.

• Evans, L. J. (2014). Altered pasts: Counterfactuals in history. London: Little, Brown.

  Google Scholar 

• Ferguson, N. (Ed.). (1997). Virtual history: Alternatives and counterfactuals. London: Picador.

  Google Scholar 

• Fogel, R. W. (1964). Railroads and American economic growth: Essays in econometric history. Baltimore, Maryland: The Johns Hopkins Press.

  Google Scholar 

• Foucault, M. (1965). Madness and civilization. Translated R. Howard. New York: Pantheon.

  Google Scholar 

• Freedman, D., Pisani, R., & Purves, R. (2007). Statistics (4th ed.). New York: W. W. Norton Inc.

  Google Scholar 

• Gaddis, J. L. (2002). The landscape of history: How historians map the past. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  Google Scholar 

• Gottschalk, L. (1950). Understanding history: A primer of historical method. New York: Alfred A Knopf.

  Google Scholar 

• Gramsci, A. (1973). Selections from the prison notebooks. Edited by Q. Hoare and G. Nowell Smith. New York: International Publishers.

• Granger, C. W. J. (1988). Causality, cointegration and control. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 12(2), 551–559.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Granger, C. W. J., & Newbold, P. (1974). Spurious regressions in econometrics. Journal of Econometrics, 2(2), 111–120.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Green, W. A. (1993). History, historians and the dynamics of change. Westport: Praeger.

  Google Scholar 

• Gregory, B. S. (2012). The unintended reformation: How a religious revolution secularized society. Cambridge: Belking Press of Harvard University.

  Book  Google Scholar 

• Grimmer-Solem, E. (2003). The rise of historical economics and social reform in Germany 1864–1894. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  Book  Google Scholar 

• Haggerty, S. (2012). ‘Merely for money?’ Business culture in the British Atlantic 1750–1815. Liverpool: Liverpool University Press.

  Google Scholar 

• Hannah, L. (2007). The ‘divorce’ of ownership from control from 1900 onwards: Re-calibrating imagined global trends. Business History, 49(4), 404–438.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Hofstede, G. (1991). Cultures and organisations: Software of the mind. London: McGraw Hill.

  Google Scholar 

• Hofstede, G. (1997). Cultures and organisations: Software of the mind. New York: McGraw-Hill.

  Google Scholar 

• Hofstede, G. (2001). Culture’s consequences: Comparing values, behaviours, institutions and organisations across nations (2d ed.). New York: Sage Publications.

  Google Scholar 

• Hood, N., & Young, S. (1979). The economics of international business. London: Longman.

  Google Scholar 

• Hufbauer, G. C., & Adler, F. (1968). US manufacturing investment and the balance of payments. Washington, DC: US Treasury Department.

  Google Scholar 

• Hymer, S. H. (1976). The international operations of national firms: Study of foreign direct investment. Cambridge: MIT Press.

  Google Scholar 

• Jackson, J. E., & Kollman, K. (2010). A formulation of path dependence with an empirical example. Quarterly Journal of Political Science, 5(3), 257–289.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Johanson, J., & Vahlne, J. E. (1977). The internationalization process of the firm: A model of knowledge development and increasing foreign market commitments. Journal of International Business Studies, 8(1), 23–32.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Johanson, J., & Vahlne, J. E. (2009). The Uppsala internationalization process model revisited: From liability of foreignness to liability of outsidership. Journal of International Business Studies, 40(9), 1411–1431.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Jones, G. (1998). Company history and business history in the 1990s. University of Reading discussion papers in economics and management (series A), p. 383.

• Jones, G. (2000). Merchants to multinationals. British trading companies in the nineteenth and twentieth centuries. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  Google Scholar 

• Jones, G., & Khanna, T. (2006). Bringing history (back) into international business. Journal of International Business Studies, 37(4), 453–468.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Jones, G., & Zeitlin, J. (Eds.). (2007). The Oxford handbook of business history. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  Google Scholar 

• Judge, W. Q., Fainshmidt, S., & Brown, J. L. (2014). Which model of capitalism best delivers both wealth and equality? Journal of International Business Studies, 45(4), 363–386.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Kipping, M., Wadhwani, R. D., & Bucheli, M. (2014). Analyzing and interpreting historical sources: A basic methodology. In M. Bucheli & R. D. Wadhwani (Eds.), Organizations in time: History, theory, methods (pp. 305–329). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  Google Scholar 

• Kobrak, C., & Schneider, A. (2011). Varieties of business history: Subject and methods for the twenty-first century. Business History, 53(3), 401–424.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Kogut, B. (2009). Methodological contributions in international business and the direction of academic research activity. In A. Rugman (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of international business (2nd ed., pp. 711–739). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  Google Scholar 

• Kogut, B., & Kulatilaka, N. (2001). Capabilities as real options. Organization Science, 12(6), 744–758.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Kogut, B., & Parkinson, D. (1998). Adoption of the multidivisional structure: Analysing history from the start. Industrial and Corporate Change, 7(2), 249–273.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Kogut, B., & Zander, U. (2000). Did socialism fail to innovate? A natural experiment of the two Zeiss companies. American Sociological Review, 65(2), 169–190.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Laidler, D. (2012). Today’s standards and yesterday’s economics—two short occasional essays—eliminating history from economic thought and Mark Blaug on the quantity theory. Economic Policy Research Institute working paper series 2012–6, University of Western Ontario.

• Lebow, R. N. (2012). Counterfactual thought experiments: A necessary teaching tool. The History Teacher, 40(2), 153–176.

  Google Scholar 

• Lebow, R. N. (2014). Archduke Franz Ferdinand lives!. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

  Google Scholar 

• Leunig, T. (2010). Social savings. Journal of Economic Surveys, 24(5), 775–800.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Ludden, D. (Ed.). (2001). Reading subaltern studies: Critical history, contested meaning and the globalization of South Asia. London: Anthem Press.

  Google Scholar 

• MacKay, R. B. (2007). ‘What if’: Synthesising debates and advancing prospects of using virtual history in management and organization theory. Management & Organizational History, 2(4), 295–314.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Mahoney, J. (2004). Comparative-historical methodology. Annual Review of Sociology, 30, 81–101.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Maielli, G., & Booth, C. (2008). Counterfactual history, management and organizations: Reflections and new directions. Management & Organizational History, 3(1), 49–61.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Moss, M. (1997). Archives, the historian and the future. In M. Bentley (Ed.), Companion to historiography (pp. 960–973). London: Routledge.

  Google Scholar 

• Nickell, S. (1981). Biases in dynamic models with fixed effects. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society, 49(6), 1417–1426.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• O’Rourke, K., & Williamson, G. (1999). Globalization and history: The evolution of a nineteenth-century Atlantic economy. Cambridge: MIT Press.

  Google Scholar 

• Oz, O. (2004). Using Boolean—and fuzzy-logic-based methods to analyse multiple case study evidence in management research. Journal of Management Inquiry, 13(2), 166–179.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Paavilainen-Mäntymäki, E., & Welch, C. (2013). How to escape an unprocessual legacy? A viewpoint from international business research. In M. E. Hassett & E. Paavilainen-Mäntymäki (Eds.), Handbook of longitudinal research methods in organisation and business studies (pp. 229–248). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

  Chapter  Google Scholar 

• Page, S. E. (2006). Path dependence. Quarterly Journal of Political Science, 1(1), 87–115.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Penrose, E. T. (1959). The theory of the growth of the firm. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.

  Google Scholar 

• Pettigrew, A. M. (1997). What is processual analysis? Scandinavian Journal of Management, 13(4), 337–348.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Ragin, C. C. (1987). The comparative method: Moving beyond qualitative and quantitative strategies. Berkeley: University of California Press.

  Google Scholar 

• Reddaway, W. B., et al. (1968). Effects of UK direct investment overseas: Final report. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  Google Scholar 

• Rowlinson, M., Toms, S., & Wilson, J. F. (2007). Competing perspectives on the ‘managerial revolution’: from ‘managerialist’ to ‘anti-managerialist’. Business History, 49(4), 464–482.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Saka-Helmhout, A. (2011). Comparative historical analysis in international management research. In R. Piekkari & C. Welch (Eds.), Rethinking the case study in international business and management research (pp. 383–407). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

  Google Scholar 

• Schwarzkopf, S. (2012). Why business historians need a constructive theory of the archive. Business Archives, 105(November), 1–9.

  Google Scholar 

• Shaver, J. M. (1998). Accounting for endogeneity when assessing strategy performance: Does entry mode choice affect FDI survival? Management Science, 44(4), 571–585.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Simiand, F. J. (1903). Méthode historique et sciences socials. Revue de Synthèse Historique, 6, 1–22.

  Google Scholar 

• Skocpol, T., & Somers, M. (1980). The uses of comparative history in macrosocial inquiry. Comparative Studies in Society and History, 22(2), 174–197.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Snyder, T. (2010). Bloodlands: Europe between Stalin and Hitler. London: The Bodley Head.

  Google Scholar 

• Steuer, M.D. et al. (1973). The impact of foreign direct investment on the U.K. London: HMSO.

• Stinchcombe, A. L. (1965). Social structure and organisations. In J. G. March (Ed.), Handbook of organizations (pp. 142–193). Chicago: Rand-McNally.

  Google Scholar 

• Tilley, C. (1983). Big structure, large processes, huge comparisons. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.

  Google Scholar 

• Toms, S., & Beck, M. (2007). The limitations of economic counterfactuals: The case of the Lancashire textile industry. Management & Organizational History, 2(4), 315–330.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Welch, C., & Paavilainen-Mäntymäki, E. (2014). Putting process (back) in: Research on the internationalization process of the firm. International Journal of Management Reviews, 16(1), 2–23.

• Whittington, R. (2007). Introduction: Comparative perspectives on the managerial revolution. Business History, 49(4), 399–403.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Wilkins, M., & Hill, F. E. (2011). American business abroad: Ford on six continents. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press (Original edition 1964 Wayne State University Press).

• Yin, R. K. (2014). Case study research: Design and methods (5th ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.

  Google Scholar 

• Zaheer, S. (1995). Overcoming the liability of foreignness. Academy of Management Journal, 38(2), 341–363.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Zeitlin, J. (2007). The historical alternatives approach. In G. Jones & J. Zeitlin (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of business history (pp. 120–140). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  Google Scholar 

Page 2

From: Historical Research Approaches to the Analysis of Internationalisation