2022 Ford Explorer vs Mazda CX-9

2022 Ford Explorer

Show

#4 in Large SUVs

2022 Mazda CX-9

#7 in Large SUVs

Add Vehicle
Get Your Price Get Your Price

Select style

Base 4WD

StyleMPG CityMPG HwyInvoiceMSRP
Explorer Base 4WD 20 27 $36,385 $37,510
Explorer Base RWD 21 28 $34,445 $35,510
Explorer King Ranch 4WD 18 24 $53,405 $55,630
Explorer King Ranch RWD 18 25 $51,485 $53,630
Explorer Limited 4WD 20 27 $47,107 $49,070
Explorer Limited RWD 21 28 $45,187 $47,070
Explorer Platinum 4WD 23 24 $52,201 $54,375
Explorer Platinum RWD 25 26 $50,281 $52,375
Explorer ST 4WD 18 24 $49,209 $51,260
Explorer ST RWD 18 25 $47,289 $49,260
Explorer ST-Line 4WD 20 27 $45,849 $47,760
Explorer ST-Line RWD 21 28 $43,929 $45,760
Explorer Timberline 4WD 19 22 $46,387 $48,320
Explorer XLT 4WD 20 27 $38,947 $40,570
Explorer XLT RWD 21 28 $37,027 $38,570

Select style

Carbon Edition AWD

StyleMPG CityMPG HwyInvoiceMSRP
CX-9 Carbon Edition AWD 20 26 $41,556 $43,930
CX-9 Grand Touring AWD 20 26 $42,370 $44,790
CX-9 Signature AWD 20 26 $44,989 $47,560
CX-9 Sport AWD 20 26 $33,707 $35,630
CX-9 Touring AWD 20 26 $35,742 $37,780
CX-9 Touring Plus AWD 20 26 $38,655 $40,860

Show Only Differences

Pricing

Invoice Price

$36,385

$41,556

Manufacturer Suggested Retail Price

$37,510

$43,930

Monthly Payment Estimate

$625 / month

$732 / month

The Car Connection's Take

TCC Rating

6.8

Read Our Full Review

6.5

Read Our Full Review

TCC’s Bottom Line

The 2022 Ford Explorer hits the spot for families who want more choice in a family SUV—although value for money isn’t a strong point. The 2022 Mazda CX-9 crossover SUV has slim third-row and cargo space, but has good road manners to spare.

TCC Likes

  • Lots of options under the hood
  • Handsome profile
  • Quiet cabin

  • Pretty, inside and out
  • Fab Signature trim
  • Good safety scores

TCC Dislikes

  • Hybrid’s disappointing drivability
  • Cramped third row
  • Second row’s clumsy adjustability

  • Poor infotainment interface
  • Slim on cargo and third-row space
  • Average warranty

Fuel Economy

City

20 mpg 20 mpg

Highway

27 mpg 26 mpg

Vehicle

EPA Classification

Standard SUV 4WD Small SUV 4WD

Interior Dimensions

Third Leg Room (in)

32.2 29.7

Passenger Volume (ft³)

152.7 135.8

Second Head Room (in)

40.5 38.5

Third Hip Room (in)

40.9 40.1

Second Shoulder Room (in)

61.9 58.1

Front Leg Room (in)

43 41

Third Head Room (in)

38.9 35.4

Passenger Capacity

7 6

Front Hip Room (in)

59.2 56.7

Third Shoulder Room (in)

54.6 53.1

Second Leg Room (in)

39 39.4

Front Head Room (in)

40.7 40.1

Second Hip Room (in)

59.1 57.4

Front Shoulder Room (in)

61.8 57.9

Exterior Dimensions

Width, Max w/o mirrors (in)

78.9 77.5

Track Width, Front (in)

66.9 65.3

Min Ground Clearance (in)

8.2 -

Length, Overall (in)

198.8 199.4

Liftover Height (in)

32.8 31.7

Height, Overall (in)

70.2 67.6

Track Width, Rear (in)

66.9 65.2

Wheelbase (in)

119.1 115.3

Cargo Area Dimensions

Cargo Box (Area) Height (in)

32.8 30.3

Cargo Area Length @ Floor to Seat 1 (in)

83.9 84.9

Cargo Volume to Seat 1 (ft³)

87.8 71.2

Cargo Area Length @ Floor to Seat 3 (in)

20.8 21.5

Cargo Volume to Seat 3 (ft³)

18.2 14.4

Cargo Box Width @ Wheelhousings (in)

48.1 40.2

Cargo Area Length @ Floor to Seat 2 (in)

49.8 50.5

Cargo Volume to Seat 2 (ft³)

47.9 38.2

Cargo Area Width @ Beltline (in)

59 58.6

Brakes

Brake ABS System

4-Wheel 4-Wheel

Disc - Rear (Yes or )

Yes Yes

Rear Brake Rotor Diam x Thickness (in)

12.6 12.8

Brake Type

4-Wheel Disc 4-Wheel Disc

Rear Drum Diam x Width (in)

NA NA

Disc - Front (Yes or )

Yes Yes

Front Brake Rotor Diam x Thickness (in)

13.6 12.6

Drum - Rear (Yes or )

NA NA

Fuel Tank

Fuel Tank Capacity, Approx (gal)

17.9 19.5

Steering

Steering Type

Rack-Pinion Rack-Pinion

Turning Diameter - Curb to Curb (ft)

- 38.8

Tires

Rear Tire Size

P255/65HR18 P255/50VR20

Rear Tire Order Code

NA NA

Front Tire Size

P255/65HR18 P255/50VR20

Spare Tire Size

Compact Compact

Front Tire Order Code

NA NA

Spare Tire Order Code

NA NA

Trailering

Dead Weight Hitch - Max Trailer Wt. (lbs)

5000 3500

Wt Distributing Hitch - Max Trailer Wt. (lbs)

5300 3500

Maximum Trailering Capacity (lbs)

5300 3500

Dead Weight Hitch - Max Tongue Wt. (lbs)

500 350

Wt Distributing Hitch - Max Tongue Wt. (lbs)

530 350

Weight Information

Base Curb Weight (lbs)

4345 4409

Wheels

Front Wheel Material

Aluminum Aluminum

Spare Wheel Material

Steel Steel

Front Wheel Size (in)

18 X 7.5 20 X 8.5

Spare Wheel Size (in)

Compact Compact

Rear Wheel Material

Aluminum Aluminum

Rear Wheel Size (in)

18 X 7.5 20 X 8.5

Engine

SAE Net Torque @ RPM

310 @ 3500 310 @ 2000

Engine Order Code

99H NA

Displacement

2.3 L/140 2.5 L/152

SAE Net Horsepower @ RPM

300 @ 5500 227 @ 5000

Engine Type

Intercooled Turbo Premium Unleaded I-4 Intercooled Turbo Regular Unleaded I-4

Fuel System

Gasoline Direct Injection Gasoline Direct Injection

Mileage

Fuel Economy Est-Combined (MPG)

23 23

EPA Fuel Economy Est - Hwy (MPG)

27 26

EPA Fuel Economy Est - City (MPG)

20 20

Transmission

Final Drive Axle Ratio (:1)

3.58 4.41

Third Gear Ratio (:1)

2.15 1.45

Trans Type

10 6

Drivetrain

Four Wheel Drive All Wheel Drive

Fifth Gear Ratio (:1)

1.52 0.71

Trans Description Cont. Again

NA NA

Reverse Ratio (:1)

4.88 3.99

Eighth Gear Ratio (:1)

0.85 -

Second Gear Ratio (:1)

3.00 1.99

Trans Order Code

44T NA

Fourth Gear Ratio (:1)

1.77 1.00

Trans Description Cont.

Automatic w/OD Automatic w/OD

Sixth Gear Ratio (:1)

1.27 0.60

Seventh Gear Ratio (:1)

1.00 -

First Gear Ratio (:1)

4.71 3.49

Summary

Vehicle Name

Ford Explorer Mazda CX-9

Body Style

Sport Utility i-ACTIV AWD Sport Utility

Suspension

Suspension Type - Rear (Cont.)

Multi-Link Multi-Link

Suspension Type - Front

Strut Strut

Suspension Type - Front (Cont.)

Strut Strut

Suspension Type - Rear

Multi-Link Multi-Link

Emissions

Tons/yr of CO2 Emissions @ 15K mi/year

7.7 7.7

Electrical

Maximum Alternator Capacity (amps)

- 150

Crash Test Ratings

Overall Rating

--

Overall Frontal Barrier Crash Rating

--

Frontal Barrier Crash Rating Driver

--

Frontal Barrier Crash Rating Passenger

--

Overall Side Crash Rating

Side Barrier Rating

Side Barrier Rating Driver

Side Barrier Rating Passenger Rear Seat

Side Pole Rating Driver Front Seat

Combined Side Rating Front Seat

Combined Side Rating Rear Seat

Rollover Rating

2022 Ford Explorer

  • 2022 Explorer in stock; 2023s available for order
  • Lease: From $459/mo
  • Rebates: No cash offers
  • Finance: From 0.9% APR

Get Your Price

2022 Mazda CX-9

  • 2022 CX-9 in stock; 2023 coming soon
  • Lease: From $355/month
  • Rebates: Up to $500 off
  • Finance: From 1.9% APR

Get Your Price

Which is better CX

Conclusion. The Mazda CX-9 is good for drivers who need a practical 3-row SUV with AWD but also want something that's fun to drive with a nice interior. The Explorer has more variety in its model range with offerings like the sporty Explorer ST, the off-road-ready Explorer Timberline, and a hybrid option.

Is the Mazda CX

The 2021 Mazda CX-9 and the 2021 Ford Explorer are both midsize, three-row SUVs with seating for seven passengers.

What is the CX

Some of those rivals include the Honda Pilot, Toyota Highlander, Hyundai Palisade, Kia Telluride, Ford Explorer, and Chevrolet Traverse. But each of those vehicles has a difficult time matching up to the 2020 Mazda CX-9's high points, as we'll show you here.

Does the Mazda CX

The first generation CX-9 was originally fitted with a 3.5 L Ford V6 engine, but, in 2008, the engine was changed to a 3.7 L unit producing 204 kW (274 hp) and 366 N⋅m (270 lb⋅ft) of torque.