Federal bureau of prisons- early release programs 2022

Needs Assessment and Programs

The BOP begins focusing on reentry when an inmate first enters custody, assessing criminogenic and other needs as part of the intake assessment and semi-annually thereafter. Inmates meet with BOP staff to discuss assessment findings and are referred for appropriate programs based on these results.

First Step Act Approved Programs Guide

The August 2022 Approved Programs Guide is a collection of the Bureau's robust reentry programs, designed to ensure all sentenced inmates have the skills necessary to succeed upon release. The approved programs are standardized across institutions, described in the Bureau's national policies, implemented with dedicated resources, and regularly reviewed to ensure program fidelity.

First Step Act Needs Assessment

With the passage of the First Step Act (FSA), the BOP turned its attention to formalizing and enhancing the needs assessment system. This June 2021 document clearly defines the 13 FSA need areas each inmate must be assessed for and the correlating EBRRs and PAs available to address each need area identified.

First Step Act Initial Review of the SPARC-13 Needs Assessment

The First Step Act (FSA) requires annual review and validation of the risk and needs assessment system. This document delineates all the work BOP has engaged in to produce a valid needs assessment system, offers early outcome data, and provides a preview of the BOP's next steps.

FY'22 Review and Revalidation of the BOP's Needs Assessment System

The National Institute of Justice (NIJ), in collaboration with the Bureau of Prisons (BOP), is seeking responses to support the annual review and revalidation of the BOP's needs assessment system, the Standardized Prisoner Assessment for Reduction in Criminality (SPARC-13). This initiative supports Section 3631 of Title I of the First Step Act (FSA) of 2018 and furthers the mission of the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) by supporting research to reduce crime and protect public safety. More information, including the Consultant Statement of Work, can be found on NIJ's website.

Have an idea for a program?

Submit proven programs to reduce recidivism through the FSA External Program Review process.

If you have an evidence-based recidivism reducing program you'd like to propose to BOP, you can submit it for consideration to be used in the Bureau of Prisons. Each program submission will be independently reviewed by social research scientists from an external organization to determine if evidence of recidivism reduction is observed and other BOP-relevant criteria are met.

US Attorney General Merrick Garland (L) swears in the new Bureau of Prisons (BOP) Director Colette ... [+] Peters (C) at BOP headquarters in Washington, DC, on August 2, 2022. (Photo by EVELYN HOCKSTEIN / POOL / AFP) (Photo by EVELYN HOCKSTEIN/POOL/AFP via Getty Images)

On Thursday September 8, 2022, federal prisoners across the country eagerly awaited the announcement of the Federal Bureau of Prisons’ (BOP) auto-calculation of First Step Act credits. For many Low and Minimum security inmates, the announcement landed with a thud.

The First Step Act (FSA) was one of the most sweeping pieces of criminal justice reform in decades. Signed into law by President Donald Trump in December 2018, the law allowed eligible inmates, those with an unlikely chance of recidivism and low or minimum security, to earn credits toward an earlier release from prison. Those credits were to be earned by prisoners participating in certain needs-based educational programs and actively participating in productive activities, like a prison job. For every 30 days of successful participation, the prisoner could earn up to 15 days off their sentence up to a maximum of 12 months (365 days). That is what the law states, but the BOP added a new wrinkle stating that those with short sentences, who are also more likely to be minimum or low security, will get no benefit of an earlier release.

A memorandum posted to federal prisoners on Thursday stated:

“Eligible inmates will continue to earn FTC [Federal Time Credits] toward early release until they have accumulate 365 days OR are 18 months from their release date, whichever happens first [emphasis added by BOP]. At this point, the release date becomes fixed, and all additional FTCs are applied toward RRC/HC [Residential Reentry Centers / Home Confinement] placement.”

The effect will be that those prisoners with short sentences will get no reduction in their sentence, something that clearly goes against the BOP’s own experts on FSA.

When a federal prisoner is sentenced, they receive 54 days of Good Conduct Time as soon as they are in federal custody. For someone sentenced to 21 months in prison, that means they would get 94 days of Good Conduct Time (54 days for 12 months then a prorated annual amount of 54 days for the other 9 months) immediately taken off their sentence. So long as the prisoner obeys the rules, their release date would be the 21 months less the 94 days. When FSA came along, the intent was to allow that same prisoner to earn additional days which could be applied to effectively reducing the sentence (a sooner transfer to supervised release, a type of probation). However, the new BOP memorandum takes that away from prisoners by setting what is an arbitrary 18 month, until release, cut-off for receiving FSAs to reduce the sentence. The result is going to be that thousands of federal inmates, many minimum security, will remain in prison for months longer than Congress intended when it passed the law.

The BOP is known for narrowly interpreting policies that could lead to prisoners being taken out of their correctional institution custody. In fact, the BOP’s initial interpretation how prisoner’s earned FSA credits was so cumbersome and limiting that almost nobody would have realized a reduction in their sentence. Congressman Hakeem Jeffries (D–NY) comment in on the BOP’s early interpretation of the type of participation needed to earn credits said that is, “...does not appear to be a good faith attempt to honor congressional intent.” It is clear that Congress wanted fewer minimum security prisoners in prison.

Prior to this memorandum, even the BOP had adopted the view that there was no restriction on when FSA credits would stop accumulating for earlier release from BOP custody. In the case of Robert Stewart v Warden of FCI Talladega (Northern District of Alabama, Case No.: 1:22-cv-00294), Stewart, a prisoner in the Talladega minimum security camp, stated that the BOP had incorrectly calculated the FSA credits and should have reduced his 21 month sentence. In that case, a BOP expert (Susan Giddings from BOP’s Central Office) provided a calculation of the FSA credits Stewart had earned, 15 days per month, which was consistent with the FSA Federal Register Final Rule, Stewart ended up winning his case. The judge ordered the BOP, which at the time did not have the auto-calculation tool, to re-calculate Mr. Stewart’s FSA credits by hand every 60 days to assure he got everything he was entitled to under the law. On July 22, 2022, Stewart was released from BOP custody having earned 165 days of FSA credits that were applied to reduce his term of incarceration. For those federal prisoners in custody today, after this most recent BOP memorandum, will receive no FSA credits to reduce their sentence. It is unfair, arbitrary and beyond the intent that Congress had when it passed the law.

There are already so many requirements that make even minimum and low security inmates ineligible. There are a total of 68 criminal offenses that exclude inmates from being eligible from applying the FSA credits to reduce their sentence. Non-US citizens are not eligible. District of Columbia offenders are ineligible as are any offender who does not have a period of supervised release. According to the Department of Justice, approximately 65,000 out of 131,386 federal prisoners, would be ineligible to earn FSA Time Credits under the FSA due to the inmate’s crime of conviction alone (as of August 27, 2020). This new 18-month requirement will further restrict those eligible for earlier release.

With this more restrictive condition, BOP is even going against the Department of Justice’s intent of FSA which was to “transfer eligible inmates who satisfy the criteria in 3624(g) [awarding of FSA credits] to supervised release to the extent practicable, rather than prerelease custody [halfway house and home confinement].” The internal memorandum posted went on to state prisoners with “immigration issues” would not be eligible. One person who retired from the BOP said of the memorandum, “BOP is creating their own language and leaving the discretion in the hands of case managers to interpret who is eligible and who is not. They have completely disrespected the intent and FSA law states.”

In Fiscal Year (FY) 2019, the cost of incarceration fee for a federal prisoner at a federal facility was $107.85 per day; in FY 2020, it was $120.59 per day. It costs less than half that to place a minimum security prisoner on home confinement and it costs nothing if the prisoner is not in custody at all. Thousands of prisoners will be affected by this unilateral decision by the BOP. For many prisoners, their date for returning to society has been prolonged by a memorandum that is both unfair and arbitrary.

What is release preparation program?

Which body has discretion to determine the early release of a prisoner before they complete their full sentence?

What is the process of releasing a prisoner?

Did the 65 law for prisoners pass in Florida 2022?