Speaking on Brian Koppelman’s podcast The Moment, the filmmaker addressed his much-publicised disdain of the film, which is based upon his script. Show
“One of the things about that script in particular is that I was trying to make it on the page, so when you read it, you saw the movie,” Tarantino explained. “It was like, why didn’t he do at least half of [my script]? It was, like, done for him.” Advertisement The filmmaker went on to confirm that he has not seen the finished film “from beginning to end”. Tarantino has a “story by” credit on Natural Born Killers. After selling the script for the film, it was heavily revised by Stone, screenwriter David Veloz and associate producer Richard Rutowsk.  As part of the ongoing feud, Tarantino was sued by the film’s producers after attempting to release his original script as a paperback book. In a 2019 interview with IndieWire, Stone addressed Tarantino’s criticism of the finished film. “It was all done legally. A lot of money was paid,” he said. With regards to the filmmaker, he said: “Yeah he didn’t care for it, but I don’t know if he ever saw it. He went around and said that and I don’t think it was the right thing to do. But that was one of my many problems. We did well in spite of it all.” Advertisement Elsewhere, Tarantino has revealed that he instructed Inglourious Basterds star Christoph Waltz to withhold his full potential ahead of the film’s shoot. “I got together with Christoph before we got to the big script reading with the cast,” Tarantino said on The Moment. “I told him, ‘I’m not doing this to be perverse game playing…everybody is so curious about who is playing Hans Landa. I don’t want you to be bad at the script reading, but I want you to hold a lot back.” Comment: Used book in good condition. May have some wear to binding, spine, cover, and pages. Some light highlighting markings writing may be present. May have some stickers and or sticker residue present. May be Ex-lib. copy. May NOT include discs, or access code or other supplemental material. Ships directly from Amazon and is eligible for Prime or super saver FREE shipping. Fulfillment by Amazon (FBA) is a service we offer sellers that lets them store their products in Amazon's fulfillment centers, and we directly pack, ship, and provide customer service for these products. Something we hope you'll especially enjoy: FBA items qualify for FREE Shipping and Amazon Prime. If you're a seller, Fulfillment by Amazon can help you grow your business. Learn more about the program. Not all publicity is good publicity, as Coca Cola found out in Natural Born Killers, a film that changed the way brands worked with movies.
In Jane Hamsher’s excellent book, Killer Instinct, the producer charts the difficult path she and Don Murphy had in bringing Natural Born Killers to the big screen. Natural Born Killers was, of course, originally a Quentin Tarantino screenplay, one that changed dramatically when Oliver Stone signed up to direct the movie. Tarantino sold the rights to the movie for $10,000 after he’d tried to set the project up himself–this was before the Oscar-winning success of Pulp Fiction–and he would regret the decision. That said, rumors that he held animosity toward Stone himself were just that. In interviews since, Tarantino has always been respectful toward the Platoon director. Back to Killer Instinct though: There are a couple of passages in the book which relate to the way product placement was used in the movie. Firstly, Hamsher reports how one particular shot was required in exchange for free pairs of cowboy shoes for some of those making the movie. The trade off was that the brand name of said shoes was on the side of a truck that needed to be included. Stone included the shot. But the part of the movie that was going to have further ramifications for how product placement was approached in the movies was mainly around the sitcom segment, “I Love Mallory.” This is where Juliette Lewis’ character in the movie appears alongside Rodney Dangerfield. It’s a divisive scene (Tarantino describes it as the moment he turned the movie off), where Stone shifts the tone of the movie, but not the content. As such, by putting a sitcom laughing track behind the exploration of Mallory’s hugely unpleasant father, Stone makes uneasy switch about what we laugh at in a sanitized entertainment context, using incredibly dark humor to do so. Ad Ad – content continues below You might not like the scene, but it’s an interesting approach. And then, pretty much straight after it, there’s an ad for Coca-Cola. If you were one of the many who sat there at the time of watching the movie wondering why on earth the Coca-Cola Company agreed to that, then you were not alone. Certain executives at the Coca-Cola Company more than shared your view. The famous Coca-Cola polar bear ad was used on more than one occasion throughout the movie, mainly when Stone was making a switch about about the violence. further reading: The Best Action Movies on Hulu So how did it happen? It’s a simple question, with a simple answer: the Natural Born Killers team asked, and the Coca-Cola Company said yes. What the Coca-Cola Company didn’t do, crucially, was watch the movie in time, or apparently insist that they saw it before it was released. As the Associated Press reported back in August 1994, “Coca-Cola thought that the spot was to be used in a scene in which Tommy Lee Jones watched the Super Bowl on television. Instead the commercial is interspersed with images such as a headless, bloody body. The spots were used three times in the movie, intercut with brutal images of mayhem”. A statement issued from the Coca-Cola Company back in 1994, with no penchant for understatement, went on to say that “we’re concerned that our commercial is being used in a way we didn’t intend and weren’t aware of.” It would be the last time that Coca-Cola took such a relaxed view to product placement in movies and television. Before then, it had been used to positive appearances in the likes of Jaws, Superman, and Superman II. Its agreement with the producers of Natural Born Killers was based on similar thinking, clearly. Said agreement appears so watertight that it can’t now get its commercial removed from further releases of the movie. Ad Ad – content continues below Oliver Stone himself admits on the commentary track for the movie that the Coca-Cola Company board of directors was “furious” when it saw the finished movie and how its branding had been used to punctuate key moments. This clearly wasn’t the vision that the firm had when it got involved with movies. At one stage, after all, the company owned Columbia Pictures, eventually selling the movie business to Sony in 1989. It does make it all just a little more surprising. After all, this wasn’t a corporation with no experience of films and how they worked. Join our mailing list Get the best of Den of Geek delivered right to your inbox! SubscribeAnd yet Natural Born Killers was testament to the way product placement was seen back in the early 1990s. The Coca-Cola Company formalized its processes in the aftermath, and many big brands heeded the same lesson. Processes were put in place, and companies suddenly became a lot more guarded about how their brands were used in the movies. Arguably as a consequence of this, the product placement business mushroomed. Because both studios and brands worked out how this could be mutually beneficial once put on a more formal footing. It wasn’t as if money hadn’t changed hands before in exchange for brand names appearing in films–although a lot of product placement back then was actually free of charge–but the proverbial goalposts most certainly shifted. Product placement became more controlled and sought after, from both sides of the fence. In 2000 for instance, just six years later, Coca-Cola actively sponsored a Warner Bros. TV show by the name of Young Americans. The show didn’t last, but the sign that things had changed came when a scene in it was reshot because a Pepsi machine was in the background at one stage. The Coca-Cola Company had gone from a business that had blindly signed off the use of one of its iconic commercials to one that was examining the deployment of its branding in minute detail. Should all of this change be laid at the door of Natural Born Killers? No, of course not. But it’s hard not to see Oliver Stone’s movie as a catalyst for change. The sheer exposure the Coca-Cola ads got from their positioning in that movie was an eye-opener, and it led to brands being far, far more controlling of their message. For a long time, trust was out of the window. read more: Once Upon a Time in Holywood Reference and Easter Egg Guide Ad Ad – content continues below Consequently, studios were aware of the impact such product placements would have, and it’s now a given that product placement can take the edge off the price of a particularly high blockbuster movie budget. Just check out Man of Steel: Warner Bros. lured in Budweiser, iHop, CNN, Sears, Nokia, and many more. According to reports, such “commercial partnerships” (that’s the current terminology) brought in over $160 million. In all, over 100 contracts with “global marketing partners” were signed for Man of Steel, and product placement made up a solid amount of those. It’s certainly a lot different from 1994. And while the collision of Natural Born Killers and the Coca-Cola Company had been coming, that it was those two that collided – on such a controversial movie anyway – was the key variable. Yet so laid back was product placement in movie theater, even in the early 1990s, that something was soon going to give. It did, and the ramifications do continue to be felt. It’s telling that no company has been caught out the same way again. For The Coca-Cola Company at least though, the reminder of the cost of not properly checking how product placement is being deployed remains present every time a Natural Born Killers disc is sold or the movie is screened somewhere. It’s proven to be a very hard lesson, and one that, in some small way, started a sea change in how movies, televisions and big brand products would work with each other. We suspect, too, that it didn’t help sell too many cans of Coke at the time… How much did Natural Born Killers sell for?Tarantino sold the rights to the movie for $10,000 after he'd tried to set the project up himself–this was before the Oscar-winning success of Pulp Fiction–and he would regret the decision.
What did Quentin Tarantino have to do with Natural Born Killers?Natural Born Killers was based on a screenplay written by Quentin Tarantino, in which a married couple suddenly decide to go on a killing spree. Tarantino had sold an option for his script to producers Jane Hamsher and Don Murphy for $10,000 after he had tried, and failed, to direct it himself for $500,000.
Did Tarantino direct Natural Born Killers?The film, directed by Oliver Stone, departed signficantly from Tarantino's original screenplay, so much so that Tarantino removed his name from the screenplay credits.
Does Quentin Tarantino like Oliver Stone?Tarantino's disdain for what Oliver Stone did with his screenplay is no secret. Quentin Tarantino's disdain for “Natural Born Killers,” the movie Oliver Stone made from the script he sold to the director, has become well-known in the 27 years since it was released.
|
How much did Tarantino Sell Natural Born Killers for?
Related Posts
Copyright © 2024 SignalDuo Inc.
