What is the primary reason for analyzing patient incident data

1. Kohn LT, Corrigan JM, Donaldson MS, (eds). To err is human: building a safer health system. Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 2000.

2. Vincent C, Neale G, Woloshynowych M. Adverse events in British hospitals: preliminary retrospective record review. BMJ. 2001;322:517–9. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

3. Garcia-Martin M, Lardelli-Claret P, Bueno-Cavanillas A, Luna-del-Castillo JD, Espigares-Garcia M, Galvez-Vargas R. Proportion of hospital deaths associated with adverse events. J Clin Epidemiol. 1997;50:1319–26. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

4. Wilson RM, Runciman WB, Gibberd RW, Harrison BT, Newby L, Hamilton JD. The Quality in Australian Health Care Study. Med J Aust. 1995;163:458–71. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

5. Britt H, Miller GC, Steven ID, Howarth GC, Nicholson PA, Bhasale AL, et al. Collecting data on potentially harmful events: a method for monitoring incidents in general practice. Fam Pract. 1997;14:101–6. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

6. Kaplan HS, Callum JL, Rabin Fastman B, Merkley LL. The Medical Event Reporting System for Transfusion Medicine: will it help get the right blood to the right patient? Transfus Med Rev. 2002;16:86–102. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

7. Staender S, Davies J, Helmreich B, Sexton B, Kaufmann M. The anaesthesia critical incident reporting system: an experience based database. Int J Med Inf. 1997;47(1-2):87–90. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

8. Wu AW, Pronovost P, Morlock L. ICU incident reporting systems. J Crit Care. 2002;17:86–94. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

9. Vincent C, Stanhope N, Crowley-Murphy M. Reasons for not reporting adverse incidents: an empirical study. J Eval Clin Pract. 1999;5:13–21. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

10. Williams L, Grayson D, Gosbee J. Patient safety-incorporating drawing software into root cause analysis software. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2002;9(6 Suppl):S52–3. [Google Scholar]

11. Bagian JP, Gosbee J, Lee CZ, Williams L, McKnight SD, Mannos DM. The Veterans Affairs root cause analysis system in action. Jt Comm J Qual Improv. 2002;28:531–45. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

12. Bates DW, Evans RS, Murff H, Stetson PD, Pizziferri L, Hripcsak G. Detecting adverse events using information technology. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2003;10:115–28. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

13. Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations. Failure Mode and Effects Analysis in Health Care: Proactive Risk Reduction. Oakbrook Terrace, IL: Joint Commission Resources, Inc; 2002.

14. Leape LL, Bates DW, Cullen DJ, et al. Systems analysis of adverse drug events. ADE Prevention Study Group. JAMA. 1995;274:35–43. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

15. Bhasale A. The wrong diagnosis: identifying causes of potentially adverse events in general practice using incident monitoring. Fam Pract. 1998;15:308–18. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

16. Leape LL. Reporting of adverse events. N Engl J Med. 2002;347:1633–8. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

17. Rosenthal J, Booth M, Flowers L, Riley T. Current State programs addressing medical errors: an analysis of mandatory reporting and other initiatives. Portland, ME: National Academy for State Health Policy; 2001. Report No. GNL35.

18. Reducing Medical Errors: A Review of Innovative Strategies to Improve Patient Safety. Testimony of Dennis S. O'Leary, President, The Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations. In: House Committee on Energy and Commerce Subcommittee on Health. Washington, DC: 2002.

19. Russler DC, Schadow G, Mead C, Snyder T, Quade LM, McDonald CJ. Influences of the Unified Service Action Model on the HL7 Reference Information Model. Proc AMIA Symp. 1999:930–4. [PMC free article] [PubMed]

20. National Coordinating Council for Medication Error Reporting and Prevention. Taxonomy of Medication Errors: United States Pharmacopeia; 1998. Available at http://www.nccmerp.org/taxo0731.pdf. Accessed Jan 3, 2003.

21. Santell JP, Hicks RW, McMeekin J, Cousins DD. Medication errors: experience of the United States Pharmacopeia (USP) MEDMARX reporting system. J Clin Pharmacol. 2003;43:760–7. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

22. Stanhope N, Crowley-Murphy M, Vincent C, O'Connor AM, Taylor-Adams SE. An evaluation of adverse incident reporting. J Eval Clin Pract. 1999;5:5–12. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

23. Cullen DJ, Bates DW, Small SD, Cooper JB, Nemeskal AR, Leape LL. The incident reporting system does not detect adverse drug events: a problem for quality improvement. Jt Comm J Qual Improv. 1995;21:541–8. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

24. Jha AK, Kuperman GJ, Teich JM, et al. Identifying adverse drug events: development of a computer-based monitor and comparison with chart review and stimulated voluntary report. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 1998;5:305–14. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

25. Carroll JS, Rudolph JW, Hatakenaka S. Lessons learned from non-medical industries: root cause analysis as culture change at a chemical plant. Qual Saf Health Care. 2002;11:266–9. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

26. Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations. Sentinel Event Policy And Procedures (Revised: July 2002); 2002. Available at http://www.jcaho.org/accredited+organizations/ambulatory+care/sentinel+events/se_pp.htm. Accessed Jan 3, 2003.

27. Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations. Root Cause Analysis in Health Care: Tools and Techniques. 2nd ed. Oakbrook Terrace, IL: Joint Commission Resources, Inc; 2002.

28. Rothschild JM, Federico FA, Gandhi TK, Kaushal R, Williams DH, Bates DW. Analysis of medication-related malpractice claims: causes, preventability, and costs. Arch Intern Med. 2002;162:2414–20. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

29. Domino KB, Posner KL, Caplan RA, Cheney FW. Airway injury during anesthesia: a closed claims analysis. Anesthesiology. 1999;91:1703–11. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

30. Larson SL, Jordan L. Preventable adverse patient outcomes: a closed claims analysis of respiratory incidents. AANA J. 2001;69:386–92. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

31. Localio AR, Lawthers AG, Brennan TA, et al. Relation between malpractice claims and adverse events due to negligence. Results of the Harvard Medical Practice Study III. N Engl J Med. 1991;325:245–51. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

32. Studdert DM, Thomas EJ, Burstin HR, Zbar BI, Orav EJ, Brennan TA. Negligent care and malpractice claiming behavior in Utah and Colorado. Med Care. 2000;38:250–60. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

33. Classen DC, Pestotnik SL, Evans RS, Burke JP. Computerized surveillance of adverse drug events in hospital patients. JAMA. 1991;266:2847–51. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

34. Honigman B, Lee J, Rothschild J, et al. Using computerized data to identify adverse drug events in outpatients. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2001;8:254–66. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

35. Evans RS, Burke JP, Classen DC, et al. Computerized identification of patients at high risk for hospital-acquired infection. Am J Infect Control. 1992;20:4–10. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

36. Rocha BH, Christenson JC, Pavia A, Evans RS, Gardner RM. Computerized detection of nosocomial infections in newborns. Proc Annu Symp Comput Appl Med Care. 1994:684–8. [PMC free article] [PubMed]

37. Tuttle D, Panzer RJ, Baird T. Using administrative data to improve compliance with mandatory state event reporting. Jt Comm J Qual Improv. 2002;28:349–58. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

38. Cox AR, Anton C, Goh CH, Easter M, Langford NJ, Ferner RE. Adverse drug reactions in patients admitted to hospital identified by discharge ICD-10 codes and by spontaneous reports. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2001;52:337–9. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

39. O'Neil AC, Petersen LA, Cook EF, Bates DW, Lee TH, Brennan TA. Physician reporting compared with medical-record review to identify adverse medical events. Ann Intern Med. 1993;119:370–6. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

40. DeRosier J, Stalhandske E, Bagian JP, Nudell T. Using health care Failure Mode and Effect Analysis: the VA National Center for Patient Safety's prospective risk analysis system. Jt Comm J Qual Improv. 2002;28:209, 248–67. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

41. Goetsch SJ. Risk analysis of Leksell Gamma Knife Model C with automatic positioning system. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2002;52:869–77. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

42. Busse DK, Wright DJ. Classification and analysis of incidents in complex medical environments. Topics in Health Information Management. 2000;20:1–11. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

43. Salb T, Burgert O, Gockel T, et al. Risk reduction in craniofacial surgery using computer-based modeling and intraoperative immersion. In: Medicine Meets Virtual Reality (MMVR); 2002 January 23-26. Newport Beach, CA: Aligned Management Associates, Inc; 2002.

44. Quality Interagency Coordination Task Force. Doing What Counts for Patient Safety: Federal Actions to Reduce Medical Errors and Their Impact. Report of the Quality Interagency Coordination Task Force (QuIC) to the President. Washington, DC: 2000. Available at http://www.quic.gov/report/toc.htm. Accessed Jan 3, 2003.

45. Kivlahan C, Sangster W, Nelson K, Buddenbaum J, Lobenstein K. Developing a comprehensive electronic adverse event reporting system in an academic health center. Jt Comm J Qual Improv. 2002;28:583–94. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

46. Callum JL, Kaplan HS, Merkley LL, Pinkerton PH, Rabin Fastman B, Romans RA, et al. Reporting of near-miss events for transfusion medicine: improving transfusion safety. Transfusion. 2001;41:1204–11. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

47. National Aeronautics and Space Administration. Aviation Safety Reporting System Program Overview. Available at http://asrs.arc.nasa.gov/briefing/program_briefing_nf.htm. Accessed Jan 3, 2003.

48. Runciman WB, Edmonds MJ, Pradhan M. Setting priorities for patient safety. Qual Saf Health Care. 2002;11:224–9. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

49. Asden P, Corrigan JM, Wolcott J, Erickson SM, (eds). Patient Safety: Achieving a New Standard for Care. Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 2003.

50. Chassin MR, Becher EC. The wrong patient. Ann Intern Med. 2002;136:826–33. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

51. Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations. 2003 National Patient Safety Goals; 2002. Available at http://www.jcaho.org/accredited+organizations/patient+safety/npsg/npsg_03.htm. Accessed Jan 3, 2003.

52. Stearns MQ, Price C, Spackman KA, Wang AY. SNOMED clinical terms: overview of the development process and project status. Proc AMIA Symp. 2001:662–6. [PMC free article] [PubMed]

53. American Medical Association. CPT 2003 Prof. Ed. Chicago, IL: AMA Press; 2003.

54. International Classification of Diseases, 9th Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-9-CM) (ed 6). Baltimore, MD: The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services; 2002.

55. Sangster W, Patrick T. Talking about medical errors: the void in existing controlled terminologies. Proc AMIA Symp. 2002:1152.

56. Boxwala AA, Zeng QT, Chamberas A, Sato L, Dierks M. Coverage of patient safety terms in the UMLS Metathesaurus. In: Musen MA, editor. Proc AMIA Annu Fall Symp; 2003. Washington, DC: American Medical Informatics Association; 2003, pp 110. [PMC free article] [PubMed]

57. Dovey SM, Meyers DS, Phillips Jr RL, et al. A preliminary taxonomy of medical errors in family practice. Qual Saf Health Care. 2002;11:233–8. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

58. Makeham MA, Dovey SM, County M, Kidd MR. An international taxonomy for errors in general practice: a pilot study. Med J Aust. 2002;177:68–72. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

59. Brown EG, Wood L, Wood S. The medical dictionary for regulatory activities (MedDRA). Drug Saf. 1999;20:109–17. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

60. Brixey J, Johnson TR, Zhang J. Evaluating a Medical Error Taxonomy. Proc AMIA Symp. 2002:71–5. [PMC free article] [PubMed]

61. Norman DA. Categorization of action slips. Psychol Rev. 1981;88:1–15. [Google Scholar]

62. Norman DA. The psychology of everyday things. New York, NY: Basic Books; 1988.

63. Hollnagel E. The phenotype of erroneous actions: implications for HCI design. In: Weir G, Alty J, (eds). Human Computer Interaction and Complex Systems. London: Academic Press; 1991, 73–121.

64. Rasmussen J. Skills, rules, knowledge: signals, signs and symbols and other distinctions in human performance models. IEEE Transactions: Systems, Man and Cybernetics. 1983(SMC-13):257–67.

65. Reason J. Human Error. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press; 1990.

66. Groeneweg J. Controlling the Controllable, The Management of Safety (ed 2). Leiden, Netherlands: DSWO Press; 1994.

67. van der Schaaf TW. PRISMA: A risk management tool based on incident analysis. In: Bier VM ed. Proceedings of Workshop on Accident Sequence Precursors and Probabilistic Risk Analysis. College Park, MD: University of Maryland Press (Center for Reliability Engineering); 1998:31–41.

68. Davies JB, Wright L, Courtney E, Reid H. Confidential Incident Reporting on the UK Railways: The ‘CIRAS’ System. Cognition, Technology & Work. 2000;2:117–25. [Google Scholar]

69. Svenson O. Accident and incident analysis based on the Accident Evolution and Barrier Function (AEB) Model. Cognition, Technology & Work. 2001;3:42–52. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

70. Shappell S, Wiegmann D. A human error approach to accident investigation: The taxonomy of unsafe operations. International Journal of Aviation Psychology. 1998;7:269–91. [Google Scholar]

71. van Vuuren W, van der Schaaf T. Modelling organizational factors of human reliability in complex man-machine systems. In: 6th IFAC Symposium on Analysis, Design and Evaluation of Man-Machine Systems; 1995.

72. Shappell SA. Human Factors Analysis and Classification System-HFACS. Washington, DC: Office of Aviation Medicine, 2000, Report No. DOT/FAA/AM-00/7.

73. Vincent C, Taylor-Adams S, Stanhope N. Framework for analysing risk and safety in clinical medicine. BMJ. 1998;316:1154–7. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

74. Zhang J, Patel VL, Johnson TR, Shortliffe EH. Toward an action-based taxonomy of human errors in medicine. In: Gray W, Schunn C, (eds). Twenty-Fourth Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society; 2002. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 2002, 970–5.

75. Kaplan HS, Battles JB, Van der Schaaf TW, Shea CE, Mercer SQ. Identification and classification of the causes of events in transfusion medicine. Transfusion. 1998;38(11-12):1071–81. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

76. Spackman KA, Campbell KE. Compositional concept representation using SNOMED: towards further convergence of clinical terminologies. Proc AMIA Symp. 1998:740–4. [PMC free article] [PubMed]

77. Lindberg DA, Humphreys BL, McCray AT. The Unified Medical Language System. Methods Inf Med. 1993;32:281–91. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

78. Sowa JF. Knowledge representation: logical, philosophical, and computational foundations. Pacific Grove, CA: PWS Publishing Co; 1999.

79. Baader F, Calvanese D, McGuinness D, Nardi D, Patel-Schneider P, (eds). The description logic handbook: theory, implementation and applications. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press; 2003.

80. Stetson PD, McKnight LK, Bakken S, Curran C, Kubose TT, Cimino JJ. Development of an ontology to model medical errors, information needs, and the clinical communication space. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2002;9(11 Suppl):S86–91. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

81. Cimino JJ. Desiderata for controlled medical vocabularies in the twenty-first century. Methods Inf Med. 1998;37(4-5):394–403. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Page 2

Partial Listing of Medical Error Terminologies with Representative Categories and Terms